ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2018
Appraisal of Basic-Hemostatic Markers in Lung Cancer Patients During Follow-Up Care After Radiotherapy Treatment.
Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effect Evaluation of Bronchial Artery Embolization for Hemoptysis of Lung Cancer and Changes in Serum Tumor Markers and miR-34 Levels.Contrast media & molecular imaging · 2022Trial
- Development and validation of a machine-learning-based triage model incorporating systemic inflammatory, nutritional, coagulation, and tumor marker parameters for identifying baseline distant metastasis in lung cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Circulating D-Dimers Increase the Risk of Mortality and Venous Thromboembolism in Patients With Lung Cancer: A Systematic Analysis Combined With External Validation.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Article
- Determination of Risk Factors Related to Supraclavicular Recurrence for Limited-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer (SCLC) Patients.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2019Article
- The Correlation of Blood Parameters with Size in Cases of Neoplastic TumorAsian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2019Article
- Is Migraine an MPV-Related Disease? An Observational Study of Polish Neurological Patients.Disease markers · 2019Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of this paper was to investigate the association between clinicopathological factors and the coagulation test in lung cancer patients during follow-up care after treatment. MATERIAL AND METHODS Ninety-five medical patients with histologically proven advanced lung carcinoma (LC) who had undergone radiotherapy were prospectively reviewed between January 2014 and December 2016. The study investigated the relationship between the biochemical results, the disease stage, and the survival rate in lung cancer patients. Post-treatment coagulation-based D-dimer (DD), fibrinogen (Fib), and complete blood count (CBC) were evaluated during the follow-up over a period of 2 years after treatment or until the patient's death. RESULTS An increase of D-dimer generates an increased chance of early death by approximately 0.03% per 1 D-dimer unit. In cases when the difference in the D-dimer concentration equals 1000, the risk of an early death increases by (1.00031000-1)×100%=35%. CONCLUSIONS High levels of D-dimer are associated with an advanced form of disease with metastasis and higher risk of early death in lung cancer patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.