Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30479270›Full record

ArticleeLife2018

Augmented reality powers a cognitive assistant for the blind.

Yang Liu, Noelle Rb Stiles, Markus Meister

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Opportunities for Human-AI Collaboration in Remote Sighted Assistance.IUI. International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Navigational aid use by individuals with visual impairments.Journal on technology and persons with disabilities : ... Annual International Technology and Persons with Disabilities Conference · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yang LiuDivision of Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-8155-9134
Noelle Rb StilesDivision of Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, United States.
Markus MeisterDivision of Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-2136-6506

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To restore vision for the blind, several prosthetic approaches have been explored that convey raw images to the brain. So far, these schemes all suffer from a lack of bandwidth. An alternate approach would restore vision at the cognitive level, bypassing the need to convey sensory data. A wearable computer captures video and other data, extracts important scene knowledge, and conveys that to the user in compact form. Here, we implement an intuitive user interface for such a device using augmented reality: each object in the environment has a voice and communicates with the user on command. With minimal training, this system supports many aspects of visual cognition: obstacle avoidance, scene understanding, formation and recall of spatial memories, navigation. Blind subjects can traverse an unfamiliar multi-story building on their first attempt. To spur further development in this domain, we developed an open-source environment for standardized benchmarking of visual assistive devices.

Indexed as

CognitionComputersProstheses and ImplantsUser-Computer InterfaceVisual PerceptionAdultAgedBlindnessBrainFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedTreatment Outcomeassistive technologyhearinghumanneurosciencesensory substitutionvision

Identifiers

PMID30479270
PMCPMC6257813

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.