Trial reportJournal of managed care & specialty pharmacy2018
Clinical Utility of Pharmacogenetic Testing and a Clinical Decision Support Tool to Enhance the Identification of Drug Therapy Problems Through Medication Therapy Management in Polypharmacy Patients.
Trial report in Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02428660 (Medication Therapy Management Combined With Drug and Gene Interaction Software and Cytochrome DNA Testing Among a Population of Polypharmacy Medicare Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 21 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Medication Therapy Management Combined With Drug and Gene Interaction Software and Cytochrome DNA Testing Among a Population of Polypharmacy Medicare Patients
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pharmacogenetic interventions to improve outcomes in patients with multimorbidity or prescribed polypharmacy: a systematic review.The pharmacogenomics journal · 2022Pooled it
- Pharmacogenomic Studies in Intellectual Disabilities and Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Systematic Review.Canadian journal of psychiatry. Revue canadienne de psychiatrie · 2021Pooled it
- Effect of genetics clinical decision support tools on health-care providers' decision making: a mixed-methods systematic review.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2021Pooled it
- Association of a CCB-Related Pharmacogenomics-Guided Strategy with Blood Pressure Outcomes and Short-Term Safety in Chinese Patients with Hypertension: A Secondary Exploratory Analysis of Two Randomized Cohorts.Drug, healthcare and patient safety · 2026Article
- Real-World Utilization of Medications With Pharmacogenetic Recommendations in Older Adults: A Scoping Review.Clinical and translational science · 2025Article
- Genetic diversity of cytochrome P450 in patients receiving psychiatric care in Greece: a step towards clinical implementation.Pharmacogenomics · 2024Article
- The Critical Role of Pharmacists in the Clinical Delivery of Pharmacogenetics in the U.S.Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Identification of Drugs Acting as Perpetrators in Common Drug Interactions in a Cohort of Geriatric Patients from Southern Italy and Analysis of the Gene Polymorphisms That Affect Their Interacting Potential.Geriatrics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Comprehensive Medication Management Services with a Holistic Point of View, a Scoping Review.Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Application of Pharmacogenomics Testing in a Community-based Facility.Hospital pharmacy · 2023Article
- Polypharmacy and precision medicine.Cambridge prisms. Precision medicine · 2023Review
- Medication reconciliation to support pharmacogenomics implementation.Annals of translational medicine · 2022Article
- Observational
- Implementation of pharmacogenomic clinical decision support for health systems: a cost-utility analysis.The pharmacogenomics journal · 2022Article
- Real-World Impact of a Pharmacogenomics-Enriched Comprehensive Medication Management Program.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Article
- A user-centered evaluation of medication therapy management alerts for community pharmacists: Recommendations to improve usability and usefulness.Research in social & administrative pharmacy : RSAP · 2021Observational
- A New Characterization of Mental Health Disorders Using Digital Behavioral Data: Evidence from Major Depressive Disorder.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Article
- Use of Clopidogrel and Proton Pump Inhibitors Alone or in Combinations in Persons with Diabetes in Denmark; Potential for CYP2C19 Genotype-Guided Drug Therapy.Metabolites · 2021Article
- Independent Community Pharmacists' Experience in Offering Pharmacogenetic Testing.Pharmacogenomics and personalized medicine · 2021Article
- Optimising Seniors' Metabolism of Medications and Avoiding Adverse Drug Events Using Data on How Metabolism by Their P450 Enzymes Varies with Ancestry and Drug-Drug and Drug-Drug-Gene Interactions.Journal of personalized medicine · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn polypharmacy patients, medication therapy management (MTM) services provide a comprehensive review of current medications and future treatment goals. Pharmacogenetics (PGx) may further optimize the identification of potential drug therapy problems (DTPs); however, the clinical utility of PGx information with a clinical decision support tool (CDST) in an MTM setting in identifying DTPs has not been systematically assessed.
objectiveTo assess the clinical utility of an MTM service enhanced by pharmacogenetic test results and a clinical decision support tool.
methodsThis study was a post hoc analysis of the data obtained from an open-label, randomized, observational trial. Polypharmacy patients eligible for MTM service were randomly assigned to 3 intervention arms: standard MTM (SMTM), MTM incorporating CDST (CMTM), and CMTM further enhanced by PGx test results of CYP450 and VKORC1 enzymes (PGxMTM). Allocation for this post hoc analysis was based on patient adherence to the research protocol and completion of a PGx test. The number of DTPs per patient was compared across the 3 arms using analysis of variance. In addition, the frequency of serious DTPs as a categorical variable (grade 3 or above vs. lower grade) was compared across the 3 arms between PGx driven and non-PGx driven DTP recommendations. Statistical significance was tested using the chi-square test. The level of agreement between the DTP seriousness and the acceptance made by prescribers was presented as Cohen's kappa coefficient.
resultsNumbers of patients after cohort reallocation based on completion of PGx testing were 104, 180, and 58 for the SMTM, CMTM, and PGxMTM arms, respectively. On average, 3.08 DTPs were identified for each patient, which was nearly identical across all 3 arms. Blinded clinical pharmacists considered seriousness (grade 3 or 4) in 31% of the PGx-related DTPs in comparison with 4.9% of the non-PGx DTPs (P < 0.001). The more serious (i.e., grade 3 or above) DTP recommendations were more likely to be accepted by prescribers with the odds ratios of 1.95 (P = 0.05) and 2.39 (P = 0.15), when the analysis was performed for all DTPs and DTPs from the PGxMTM arm only, respectively.
conclusionsMTM enhanced by PGx testing and the clinical decision support tool did not increase the number of DTPs identified. However, PGx testing and the decision support software helps pharmacists determine more serious DTPs, and resulting subsequent recommendations were more readily accepted by a prescriber. Future study of the patient safety outcomes and overall health care costs associated with the utility of the decision support is warranted. DISCLOSURES: No funding was received for conducting the post hoc analysis presented in this study. Magness is employed by Magellan Health, which received funding from Genelex for costs to administrate the medication management program. The open-label randomized trial was sponsored by Genelex (Clinicaltrials.gov ID number NCT02428660). PGx tests were provided and laboratory analysis was performed by Genelex. Valerie Baron is an employee of YouScript, which created the clinical decision support tool used in this study and formerly was part of Genelex. The other authors have nothing to disclose.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.