Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30479094›Full record

ReviewJournal of gynecologic oncology2019

Current state and outlook for drug repositioning anticipated in the field of ovarian cancer.

Yusuke Kobayashi, Kouji Banno, Haruko Kunitomi, Eiichiro Tominaga, Daisuke Aoki

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of gynecologic oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Metformin and ovarian cancer: the evidence.Annals of translational medicine · 2020
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Drug Repositioning of the αInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yusuke KobayashiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan. kobax@a2.keio.jp.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4503-2845
Kouji BannoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2610-2833
Haruko KunitomiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3045-337X
Eiichiro TominagaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9243-0267
Daisuke AokiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9596-8326
Keio University · JP

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 18K16780
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ovarian cancer is the seventh most common cancer and the eighth most common cause of cancer mortality in women. Although standard chemotherapy is the established treatment for ovarian cancer, the prognosis remains poor, and it is highly anticipated that new drugs will be developed. New drugs, such as humanized anti-vascular endothelial growth factor monoclonal antibodies and poly ADP-ribose polymerase inhibitors, are expected to improve clinical outcomes of ovarian cancer. However, long-term, costly research is required to develop such new drugs, and soaring national healthcare costs are becoming a concern worldwide. In this social context, drug repositioning, wherein existing drugs are used to develop drugs with new indications for other diseases, has recently gained attention. Because trials have already confirmed the safety in humans and the pharmacokinetics of such drugs, the development period is shorter than the conventional development of a new drug, thereby reducing costs. This review discusses the available basic experimental and clinical data on drugs used for other types of cancer for which drug repositioning is anticipated to repurpose the drug for the treatment of ovarian cancer. These include statins, which are used to treat dyslipidemia; bisphosphonate, which is used to treat osteoporosis; metformin, which is used to treat diabetes; non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs; ivermectin, an antiparasitic agent; and itraconazole, an anti-fungal agent. These drugs will play an important role in future drug repositioning strategies for ovarian cancer. Furthermore, drug repositioning is anticipated to extend not only to ovarian cancer treatment but also to ovarian cancer prevention.

Indexed as

Antifungal AgentsAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalAntiparasitic AgentsCarcinoma, Ovarian EpithelialDiphosphonatesDrug RepositioningFemaleHealth Care CostsHumansHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsItraconazoleIvermectinMetforminOvarian NeoplasmsAntifungal AgentsAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalAntiparasitic AgentsDiphosphonatesHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsItraconazoleIvermectinMetforminDrug RepositioningMetforminNSAIDsOvarian Cancer

Identifiers

PMID30479094
PMCPMC6304407
OpenAlexW2896442376

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.