ArticleBiometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift2019
A Bayesian joint model of recurrent events and a terminal event.
Article in Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Semiparametric regression analysis of panel binary data with a dependent failure time.Journal of applied statistics · 2025Article
- Bayesian semi-parametric inference for clustered recurrent events with zero inflation and a terminal event.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series C, Applied statistics · 2024Article
- Dynamic risk score modeling for multiple longitudinal risk factors and survival.Computational statistics & data analysis · 2024Article
- Tackling dynamic prediction of death in patients with recurrent cardiovascular events.Statistics in medicine · 2023Article
- Bayesian criterion-based assessments of recurrent event models with applications to commercial truck driver behavior studies.Statistics in medicine · 2022Article
- Analysis of cyclic recurrent event data with multiple event types.Japanese journal of statistics and data science · 2021Article
- Joint modeling of longitudinal data with informative cluster size adjusted for zero-inflation and a dependent terminal event.Statistics in medicine · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Recurrent events could be stopped by a terminal event, which commonly occurs in biomedical and clinical studies. In this situation, dependent censoring is encountered because of potential dependence between these two event processes, leading to invalid inference if analyzing recurrent events alone. The joint frailty model is one of the widely used approaches to jointly model these two processes by sharing the same frailty term. One important assumption is that recurrent and terminal event processes are conditionally independent given the subject-level frailty; however, this could be violated when the dependency may also depend on time-varying covariates across recurrences. Furthermore, marginal correlation between two event processes based on traditional frailty modeling has no closed form solution for estimation with vague interpretation. In order to fill these gaps, we propose a novel joint frailty-copula approach to model recurrent events and a terminal event with relaxed assumptions. Metropolis-Hastings within the Gibbs Sampler algorithm is used for parameter estimation. Extensive simulation studies are conducted to evaluate the efficiency, robustness, and predictive performance of our proposal. The simulation results show that compared with the joint frailty model, the bias and mean squared error of the proposal is smaller when the conditional independence assumption is violated. Finally, we apply our method into a real example extracted from the MarketScan database to study the association between recurrent strokes and mortality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.