ArticleJournal of advanced nursing2019
Shared decision-making in the BREATHE asthma intervention trial: A research protocol.
Article in Journal of advanced nursing, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Self-care Decision-making: Feasibility of the BREATHE Asthma Intervention Trial
Self-care Decision-making: Feasibility of the BREATHE Asthma Intervention Trial - Phase II (Part 2 - a Pilot Randomized Trial Phase)
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Consultation-based interventions to optimize medication adherence in primary care: a systematic review.Family practice · 2026Pooled it
- Group-randomized trial of tailored brief shared decision-making to improve asthma control in urban black adults.Journal of advanced nursing · 2021Trial
- Community partners identified implementation considerations prior to a randomized clinical trial for uncontrolled asthma in Federally Qualified Health Centers.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2025Article
- Speech recognition can help evaluate shared decision making and predict medication adherence in primary care setting.PloS one · 2022Article
- Enhancing Recruitment and Retention of Minority Populations for Clinical Research in Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine: An Official American Thoracic Society Research Statement.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2021Article
- Reference range number line format preferred by adults for display of asthma control status.The Journal of asthma : official journal of the Association for the Care of Asthma · 2020Article
- African Americans Want a Focus on Shared Decision-Making in Asthma Adherence Interventions.The patient · 2020Article
- New insights to improve treatment adherence in asthma and COPD.Patient preference and adherence · 2019Article
- Real-world Drivers Behind Communication, Medication Adherence, and Shared Decision Making In Minority Adults with Asthma.Journal of primary care & community healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimTo evaluate the preliminary effectiveness of the BRief Evaluation of Asthma THerapy intervention, a 7-min primary care provider-delivered shared decision-making protocol that uses motivational interviewing to address erroneous asthma disease and medication beliefs.
designA multi-centre masked two-arm group-randomized clinical trial.
methodsThis 2-year pilot study is funded (September 2016) by the National Institute of Nursing Research. Eight providers will be randomized to one of two arms: the active intervention (N = 4) or a dose-matched attention control (N = 4). Providers will deliver the intervention to which they were randomized to 10 Black adult patients with uncontrolled asthma (N = 80). Patients will be followed three months postintervention to test the preliminary intervention effects on asthma control (primary outcome) and on medication adherence, lung function, and asthma-related quality of life (secondary outcomes). DISCUSSION: This study will evaluate the preliminary impact of a novel shared decision-making intervention delivered in a real world setting to address erroneous disease and medication beliefs as a means of improving asthma control in Black adults. Results will inform a future, large-scale randomized trial with sufficient power to test the intervention's effectiveness. IMPACT: Shared decision-making is an evidence-based intervention with proven effectiveness when implemented in the context of labour- and time-intensive research protocols. Medication adherence is linked with the marked disparities evident in poor and minority adults with asthma. Addressing this requires a novel multifactorial approach as we have proposed. To ensure sustainability, shared decision-making interventions must be adapted to and integrated into real-world settings.
trial registrationRegistered at clincialtrials.gov as NCT03036267 and NCT03300752.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.