Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30478903›Full record

ArticlePhysiologia plantarum2019

Coincidence of potato CONSTANS (StCOL1) expression and light cannot explain night-break repression of tuberization.

Faline D M Plantenga, Ep Heuvelink, Juriaan A Rienstra, Richard G F Visser, Christian W B Bachem, Leo F M Marcelis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physiologia plantarum, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. New Horizons in Plant Photoperiodism.Annual review of plant biology · 2023
    Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Faline D M PlantengaHorticulture and Product Physiology, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7361-6541
Ep HeuvelinkHorticulture and Product Physiology, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Juriaan A RienstraHorticulture and Product Physiology, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Richard G F VisserPlant Breeding, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Christian W B BachemPlant Breeding, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Leo F M MarcelisHorticulture and Product Physiology, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.

Funding

Beekenkamp PlantsIncotecNederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk OnderzoekNetherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO)SignifySolynta
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the obligate short-day potato Solanum tuberosum group Andigena (Solanum andigena), short days, or actually long nights, induce tuberization. Applying a night break in the middle of this long night represses tuberization. However, it is not yet understood how this repression takes place. We suggest a coincidence model, similar to the model explaining photoperiodic flowering in Arabidopsis. We hypothesize that potato CONSTANS (StCOL1), expressed in the night of a short day, is stabilized by the light of the night break. This allows for StCOL1 to repress tuberization through induction of StSP5G, which represses the tuberization signal StSP6A. We grew S. andigena plants in short days, with night breaks applied at different time points during the dark period, either coinciding with StCOL1 expression or not. StCOL1 protein presence, StCOL1 expression and expression of downstream targets StSP5G and StSP6A were measured during a 24-h time course. Our results show that a night break applied during peak StCOL1 expression is unable to delay tuberization, while coincidence with low or no StCOL1 expression leads to severely repressed tuberization. These results imply that coincidence between StCOL1 expression and light does not explain why a night break represses tuberization in short days. Furthermore, stable StCOL1 did not always induce StSP5G, and upregulated StSP5G did not always lead to fully repressed StSP6A. Our findings suggest there is a yet unknown level of control between StCOL1, StSP5G and StSP6A expression, which determines whether a plant tuberizes.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, PlantLightModels, BiologicalPhotoperiodPlant ProteinsPlant TubersSolanum tuberosumTranscription FactorsUp-RegulationPlant ProteinsTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID30478903
PMCPMC7379991

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.