Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30478813›Full record

ArticleInternational urology and nephrology2019

Transvesical laparoendosopic single-site surgery as a valuable option to remove eroded materials from the bladder: single-center experience and a review of the literature.

Maciej Przudzik, Michał Borowik, Mirosław Łesiów, Roman Łesiów

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International urology and nephrology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Maciej PrzudzikDepartment of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Warmia and Mazury, Ul. Oczapowskiego 2, 10-719, Olsztyn, Poland. maciej.przudzik@uwm.edu.pl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1172-8665
Michał BorowikDepartment of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Warmia and Mazury, Ul. Oczapowskiego 2, 10-719, Olsztyn, Poland.
Mirosław ŁesiówDepartment of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Warmia and Mazury, Ul. Oczapowskiego 2, 10-719, Olsztyn, Poland.
Roman ŁesiówDepartment of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Warmia and Mazury, Ul. Oczapowskiego 2, 10-719, Olsztyn, Poland.
University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCurrently, polypropylene materials are used widely for the treatment of various urogynecologic disorders. This type of treatment can be complicated, although rarely, with erosions of the polypropylene implants into the bladder or the urethra. There is no established treatment for such complications. We present our experience in transvesical laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (T-LESS) removal of eroded materials, and a review of the literature in this field. MATERIALS AND

methodsFrom June 2015 to May 2017 eight females, with an average age of 66.5 years (range 55-80 years), were referred to our Center because of the erosion of polypropylene material in the bladder, after anti-incontinence or pelvic organ prolapse treatment. Patients were diagnosed with ultrasound and cystoscopy. Seven bladder erosions and one bladder and urethral penetration were found. Patients were qualified for removal with the T-LESS approach. The Tri-Port + disposable set and standard laparoscopic instruments were used. The eroded materials were dissected and cut away, and the defects of the bladder wall were closed with barbed sutures. The peri-operative efficacy and safety of the method were assessed, and the patients were scheduled for follow-up visits at 6 weeks and every 3 months thereafter. The patients were offered a cystoscopic exam during the 7-10 month period after the operation.

resultsThe procedures were completed successfully in all patients. No blood loss or complications were observed. The mean operative time was 54.5 min, and the average hospital stay was 30 h. During a follow-up at 11 months, all patients were cured, except for one who presented urethral erosion.

conclusionsThe T-LESS technique for removal of eroded meshes is a safe and effective method. The precise access to the bladder minimizes morbidity, and suturing the bladder wall defects may reduce the risk of recurrence.

Indexed as

Urologic Surgical ProceduresAgedCystoscopyDevice RemovalEquipment FailureFemaleHumansLaparoscopyMaleMiddle AgedOperative TimePelvic Organ ProlapsePolypropylenesPostoperative ComplicationsSuburethral SlingsTreatment OutcomePolypropylenesComplicationsLaparoendoscopic single-site surgerySurgeryUrinary incontinence

Identifiers

PMID30478813
PMCPMC6394444
OpenAlexW2902016751

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.