ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2019
A reliable method for colorectal cancer prediction based on feature selection and support vector machine.
Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- MicroAIbiome: Decoding Cancer Types from Microbial Profiles Using Explainable Machine Learning.Microorganisms · 2025Article
- Machine learning to evaluate the effects of non-clinical social determinant features in predicting colorectal Cancer mortality in a medically underserved Appalachian population.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- The development of an efficient artificial intelligence-based classification approach for colorectal cancer response to radiochemotherapy: deep learning vs. machine learning.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- A review of machine learning methods for cancer characterization from microbiome data.NPJ precision oncology · 2024Review
- Article
- Identifying the tumor location-associated candidate genes in development of new drugs for colorectal cancer using machine-learning-based approach.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2022Article
- Development and validation of a risk index to predict kidney graft survival: the kidney transplant risk index.BMC medical research methodology · 2021Article
- Microbiome Analysis of More Than 2,000 NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme Samples Shows the Potential to Improve Screening Accuracy.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2021Article
- Self-evoluting framework of deep convolutional neural network for multilocus protein subcellular localization.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2020Article
- Colorectal Cancer Prediction Based on Weighted Gene Co-Expression Network Analysis and Variational Auto-Encoder.Biomolecules · 2020Article
- A Model Using Support Vector Machines Recursive Feature Elimination (SVM-RFE) Algorithm to Classify Whether COPD Patients Have Been Continuously Managed According to GOLD Guidelines.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2020Article
- Using machine learning techniques to develop risk prediction models to predict graft failure following kidney transplantation: protocol for a retrospective cohort study.F1000Research · 2019Article
- Explainable Machine Learning Models for Colorectal Cancer Prediction Using Clinical Laboratory Data.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer CenterArticle
- Colorectal Cancer Detected by Machine Learning Models Using Conventional Laboratory Test Data.Technology in cancer research & treatmentArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a common cancer responsible for approximately 600,000 deaths per year worldwide. Thus, it is very important to find the related factors and detect the cancer accurately. However, timely and accurate prediction of the disease is challenging. In this study, we build an integrated model based on logistic regression (LR) and support vector machine (SVM) to classify the CRC into cancer and normal samples. From various factors, human location, age, gender, BMI, and cancer tumor type, tumor grade, and DNA, of the cancer, we select the most significant factors (p < 0.05) using logistic regression as main features, and with these features, a grid-search SVM model is designed using different kernel types (Linear, radial basis function (RBF), Sigmoid, and Polynomial). The result of the logistic regression indicates that the Firmicutes (AUC 0.918), Bacteroidetes (AUC 0.856), body mass index (BMI) (AUC 0.777), and age (AUC 0.710) and their combined factors (AUC 0.942) are effective for CRC detection. And the best kernel type is RBF, which achieves an accuracy of 90.1% when k = 5, and 91.2% when k = 10. This study provides a new method for colorectal cancer prediction based on independent risky factors. Graphical abstract Flow chart depicting the method adopted in the study. LR (logistic regression) and ROC curve are used to select independent features as input of SVM. SVM kernel selection aims to find the best kernel function for classification by comparing Linear, RBF, Sigmoid, and Polynomial kernel types of SVM, and the result shows the best kernel is RBF. Classification performance of LR + RF, LR + NB, LR + KNN, and LR + ANNs models are compared with LR + SVM. After these steps, the cancer and healthy individuals can be classified, and the best model is selected.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30478811What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.