Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30478811›Full record

ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2019

A reliable method for colorectal cancer prediction based on feature selection and support vector machine.

Dandan Zhao, Hong Liu, Yuanjie Zheng, Yanlin He, Dianjie Lu, Chen Lyu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Microbiome Analysis of More Than 2,000 NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme Samples Shows the Potential to Improve Screening Accuracy.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Dandan ZhaoShandong Normal University, School of Information Science and Engineering, No. 88, Wenhua East Road, Jinan, People's Republic of China.
Hong LiuShandong Normal University, School of Information Science and Engineering, No. 88, Wenhua East Road, Jinan, People's Republic of China. lhsdcn@126.com.
Yuanjie ZhengShandong Normal University, School of Information Science and Engineering, No. 88, Wenhua East Road, Jinan, People's Republic of China.
Yanlin HeShandong Normal University, School of Information Science and Engineering, No. 88, Wenhua East Road, Jinan, People's Republic of China.
Dianjie LuShandong Normal University, School of Information Science and Engineering, No. 88, Wenhua East Road, Jinan, People's Republic of China.
Chen LyuShandong Normal University, School of Information Science and Engineering, No. 88, Wenhua East Road, Jinan, People's Republic of China.

Funding

Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province ZR2016FB13the National Natural Science Foundation of China 61472232the National Natural Science Foundation of China 61572300
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a common cancer responsible for approximately 600,000 deaths per year worldwide. Thus, it is very important to find the related factors and detect the cancer accurately. However, timely and accurate prediction of the disease is challenging. In this study, we build an integrated model based on logistic regression (LR) and support vector machine (SVM) to classify the CRC into cancer and normal samples. From various factors, human location, age, gender, BMI, and cancer tumor type, tumor grade, and DNA, of the cancer, we select the most significant factors (p < 0.05) using logistic regression as main features, and with these features, a grid-search SVM model is designed using different kernel types (Linear, radial basis function (RBF), Sigmoid, and Polynomial). The result of the logistic regression indicates that the Firmicutes (AUC 0.918), Bacteroidetes (AUC 0.856), body mass index (BMI) (AUC 0.777), and age (AUC 0.710) and their combined factors (AUC 0.942) are effective for CRC detection. And the best kernel type is RBF, which achieves an accuracy of 90.1% when k = 5, and 91.2% when k = 10. This study provides a new method for colorectal cancer prediction based on independent risky factors. Graphical abstract Flow chart depicting the method adopted in the study. LR (logistic regression) and ROC curve are used to select independent features as input of SVM. SVM kernel selection aims to find the best kernel function for classification by comparing Linear, RBF, Sigmoid, and Polynomial kernel types of SVM, and the result shows the best kernel is RBF. Classification performance of LR + RF, LR + NB, LR + KNN, and LR + ANNs models are compared with LR + SVM. After these steps, the cancer and healthy individuals can be classified, and the best model is selected.

Indexed as

Support Vector MachineArea Under CurveBody Mass IndexColorectal NeoplasmsHumansLogistic ModelsModels, BiologicalReproducibility of ResultsROC CurveSensitivity and SpecificityColorectal cancerLogistic regressionMicrobiomeSupport vector machine

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.