ArticleZeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie2019
[The practice staff in primary care dementia recognition-is there an untapped potential?]
Article in Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Usability of a Tablet-Based Cognitive Assessment Administered by Medical Assistants in General Practice: Implementation Study.JMIR formative research · 2025Article
- How do patients, medical assistants and physicians accept and experience tablet-based cognitive testing by medical assistants in general practice? - A qualitative study.BMC primary care · 2025Article
- Prerequisites for providing effective support to family caregivers within the primary care setting - results of a study series in Germany.BMC family practice · 2021Article
- Factors influencing general practitioners' perception of and attitude towards dementia diagnostics and care-results of a survey among primary care physicians in Germany.Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946) · 2021Article
- Primary dementia care based on the individual needs of the patient: study protocol of the cluster randomized controlled trial, DemStepCare.BMC geriatrics · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIt is regularly criticized that the diagnostics of dementia are not used effectively and consistently enough in general practitioner (GP) care. An important component for the optimization of early detection is the targeted training and involvement of the practice staff. To date, there is a lack of studies that capture the extent to which primary care personnel are actually integrated into dementia recognition and how they assess their own potential to contribute to a more efficient diagnosis of dementia. MATERIAL AND
methodsThe study was based on 45 qualitative individual interviews with GP practice personnel in Rhineland-Palatinate and Hesse, which were conducted orally and personally between November 2017 and June 2018 (duration: 25-70 min).
resultsThe results show that GP personnel showed a great willingness to support the family doctor in dementia recognition and diagnostics; however, this potential is only partly used in primary care practices. Most of the sample showed marked uncertainties in assessing possible signs of incipient dementia. This corresponds to the fact that only a minority of the interviewees had ever completed training in which dementia was an important topic. The identification of dementia patients by the practice employees seems to function according to the random principle and less according to systematic criteria.
conclusionThe analysis showed that many GPs are not yet aware of the opportunities offered by a greater involvement of practice personnel in the recognition of dementia. Accordingly, GPs should be advised of the benefits of such a solution. At the same time, more attention should be paid to low-threshold training formats, which are tailored specifically to the perspective of practice employees and convey important dementia-specific diagnostics, action and communication skills.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.