ArticleSurgical endoscopy2019
Long-term follow-up of endoscopic totally extraperitoneal direct inguinal hernia repair using the Endoloop technique.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cruciate gear suture: a simple and effective technique for pseudo-sac management in TAPP.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2026Trial
- Effect of direct defect closure during laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair ("TEP/TAPP plus" technique) on post-operative outcomes.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe pre-tied suture Endoloop™ technique for plication of the weakened transversalis fascia is efficient in post-operative seroma prevention, after laparoscopic/endoscopic direct inguinal hernia repair. No studies have evaluated long-term tolerability of this new technique in regards to chronic pain and hernia recurrence.
methodsProspective longitudinal evaluation study of consecutive patients treated with Endoloop™ for M2 or M3 direct defects, during endoscopic totally extraperitoneal approach. Meshes were secured with fibrin sealant only. All patients had a minimum 2.8 years (median 5.9 years) follow-up. First outcome was chronic groin/testicular pain; secondary outcome parameters included hernia recurrence and Quality of Life (QoL). Patients were assessed by phone interview using the validated Carolinas Comfort Scale (CCS), questioned regarding recurrence and asked to present for clinical review as needed.
results112 patients (median age 57 years) with 141 direct hernia defects were included during the study period of 2008-2014. An Endoloop™ was used on 127 occasions-79 M2 and 48 M3 direct hernias. One patient had an early recurrence requiring an open repair and was therefore excluded. Thirty-three of the remaining one hundred and eleven patients (29.7%) were lost to long-term follow-up. According to their CCS range, 70 patients (88.6%) were very satisfied with their results, 8 (10.1%) were satisfied, and only one patient (1.3%) who reported chronic groin pain was unsatisfied. There was no reported long-term hernia recurrence.
conclusionThe PDS Endoloop™ technique for closure of direct inguinal hernia defects is well tolerated with low risk of hernia recurrence, chronic pain, and excellent QoL. This reliability persists to long-term follow-up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.