Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30478669›Full record

ArticleStrahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al]2019

Linac-based radiosurgery or fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy with flattening filter-free volumetric modulated arc therapy in elderly patients : A mono-institutional experience on 110 brain metastases.

Fabiana Gregucci, Alba Fiorentino, Stefanie Corradini, Vanessa Figlia, Rosario Mazzola, Francesco Ricchetti, Ruggero Ruggieri, Filippo Alongi

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al], 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Fabiana GregucciDepartment of Radiation Oncology, IRCCS, Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Via don A. Sempreboni 5, 37024, Negrar, Verona, Italy. fabianagregucci@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9947-9650
Alba FiorentinoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, IRCCS, Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Via don A. Sempreboni 5, 37024, Negrar, Verona, Italy.
Stefanie CorradiniDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
Vanessa FigliaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, IRCCS, Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Via don A. Sempreboni 5, 37024, Negrar, Verona, Italy.
Rosario MazzolaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, IRCCS, Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Via don A. Sempreboni 5, 37024, Negrar, Verona, Italy.
Francesco RicchettiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, IRCCS, Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Via don A. Sempreboni 5, 37024, Negrar, Verona, Italy.
Ruggero RuggieriDepartment of Radiation Oncology, IRCCS, Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Via don A. Sempreboni 5, 37024, Negrar, Verona, Italy.
Filippo AlongiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, IRCCS, Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Via don A. Sempreboni 5, 37024, Negrar, Verona, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThe aim of this study was to analyze the feasibility and clinical results of linear accelerator (linac-)based stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) or fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (SFRT) with flattening filter-free (FFF) volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) in elderly patients affected by brain metastases (BMs). PATIENTS AND

methodsPatients selected for the present analysis were ≥65 years old with a life expectancy of >3 months, a controlled or synchronous primary tumor, and <10 BMs with a diameter <3 cm. All patients were treated with FFF linac-based SRS/SFRT. The prescribed total dose (15-30 Gy/1-5 fractions) was based on BM size and proximity to organs at risk (OAR). Toxicity was assessed according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v4.0. MedCalc v18.2 (MedCalc Software, Ostend, Belgium) was used for statistical analysis.

resultsFrom April 2014 to December 2017, 40 elderly patients with 110 BMs were treated by FFF linac-based SRS/SFRT. With a median follow-up of 28 months (range 6-50 months), median and 1‑year overall survival were 9 months and 39%, respectively; median intracranial progression-free survival was 6 months. At the time of the analysis, local control was reported in 109/110 BMs (99.1%): 12 BMs had a complete response; 51 a partial response; 46 showed stable disease. One BM (0.9%) progressed after 2 months. BM volume (<1 cc) and higher SRS/SFRT dose correlated to treatment response (p = 0.01 and p = 0.0017, respectively). No adverse events higher than grade 2 were observed.

conclusionThe present findings highlight the feasibility, safety, and effectiveness of FFF linac-based SRS/SFRT in elderly patients with BMs.

Indexed as

Dose Fractionation, RadiationAgedBrain NeoplasmsFeasibility StudiesFemaleGermanyHumansMaleOrgans at RiskPatient SafetyProgression-Free SurvivalRadiation InjuriesRadiosurgeryRadiotherapy DosageRadiotherapy, Intensity-ModulatedTreatment OutcomeAgedOrgans at riskQuality of lifeSurvivalToxicity

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.