Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30478530›Full record

ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract2019

Preferences for Surveillance of Barrett's Oesophagus: a Discrete Choice Experiment.

Norma B Bulamu, Gang Chen, Tim Bright, Julie Ratcliffe, Adrian Chung, Robert J L Fraser, Björn Törnqvist, David I Watson

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Norma B BulamuFlinders Centre for Innovation in Cancer, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, 5041, Australia.
Gang ChenFlinders Centre for Innovation in Cancer, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, 5041, Australia. gang.chen@flinders.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-8385-5965
Tim BrightDiscipline of Surgery, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Julie RatcliffeInstitute of Choice, University of South Australia Business School, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Adrian ChungDiscipline of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Robert J L FraserDiscipline of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Björn TörnqvistDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Danderyd Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
David I WatsonFlinders Centre for Innovation in Cancer, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, 5041, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeEndoscopic surveillance for Barrett's oesophagus is undertaken to detect dysplasia and early cancer, and to facilitate early intervention. Evidence supporting current practice is of low quality and often influenced by opinion. This study investigated the preferences of patients for surveillance of Barrett's oesophagus in an Australian cohort.

methodsFour Barrett's oesophagus surveillance characteristics/attributes were evaluated within a discrete choice experiment based on literature and expert opinion: (1) surveillance method (endoscopy vs a blood test vs a novel breath test), (2) risk of missing a cancer over a 10-year period, (3) screening interval, and (4) out-of-pocket cost. The data from the discrete choice experiment was analysed within the framework of random utility theory using a mixed logit regression model.

resultsThe study sample comprised patients (n = 71) undergoing endoscopic surveillance for Barrett's oesophagus of whom n = 65 completed the discrete choice experiment. The sample was predominantly male (77%) with average age of 65 years. All attributes except surveillance method significantly influenced respondents' preference for Barrett's oesophagus surveillance. Policy analyses suggested that compared to the reference case (i.e. endoscopy provided annually at no upfront cost and with a 4% risk of missing cancer), increasing test sensitivity to 0.5% risk of missing cancer would increase participation by up to 50%; surveillance every 5 years would lead to 26% reduction, while every 3 to 3.5 years would result in 7% increase in participation. Respondents were highly averse to paying A$500 for the test, resulting in 48% reduction in participation. None of the other surveillance methods was preferred to endoscopy, both resulting in 11% reduction in participation.

conclusionTest sensitivity, test frequency and out-of-pocket cost were the key factors influencing surveillance uptake. Patients prefer a test with the highest sensitivity, offered frequently, that incurs no upfront costs.

Indexed as

Patient PreferenceAgedAustraliaBarrett EsophagusBreath TestsCohort StudiesEarly Detection of CancerEsophageal NeoplasmsEsophagoscopyFemaleHealth Care CostsHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedTime FactorsBarrett’s oesophagusDiscrete choice experimentSurveillance

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.