Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30478501›Full record

ArticleRadiological physics and technology2019

Risk of radiation-induced lens opacities among surgeons and interventional medical staff.

Luca Coppeta, Antonio Pietroiusti, Anna Neri, Agostino Spataro, Elisabetta De Angelis, Stefano Perrone, Andrea Magrini

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Radiological physics and technology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Occupational Low-Dose Radiation Affects the Expression of Immune Checkpoint of Medical Radiologists.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Luca CoppetaDepartment of Occupational Medicine, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Viale Oxford 81, 00133, Rome, Italy. lcoppeta@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2470-6107
Antonio PietroiustiDepartment of Occupational Medicine, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Viale Oxford 81, 00133, Rome, Italy.
Anna NeriDepartment of Occupational Medicine, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Viale Oxford 81, 00133, Rome, Italy.
Agostino SpataroDepartment of Occupational Medicine, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Viale Oxford 81, 00133, Rome, Italy.
Elisabetta De AngelisDepartment of Occupational Medicine, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Viale Oxford 81, 00133, Rome, Italy.
Stefano PerroneDepartment of Occupational Medicine, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Viale Oxford 81, 00133, Rome, Italy.
Andrea MagriniDepartment of Occupational Medicine, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Viale Oxford 81, 00133, Rome, Italy.
University of Rome Tor Vergata · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The main effect of ionizing radiation on the eyes is the onset of posterior cortical and subcapsular cataracts. Recent studies have raised questions about the mechanism of ocular damage and the threshold dose for the onset of such effects. Currently, operators may be exposed to ionizing radiation during surgical procedures. It has been estimated that urologists can be exposed to an annual dose close to or above 20 mSv/year. The aim of our study was to evaluate the frequency of cataracts in a group of professional radiological operators to verify their possible association with the radiation dose to the crystalline lens and the tasks performed. The records of 73 health workers exposed to ionizing radiation were reviewed. The average annual dose to the crystalline lens, the number of years of exposure, and the presence of radiation-compatible opacities were assessed for all operators. Lenticular opacities were observed in 16.4% of subjects. The presence of alterations was associated with exposure doses below 10 mSv and > 10 years' experience in fluoroscopically guided procedures. Based on our results, protection of the crystalline lens against exposure to ionizing radiation by means of goggles is recommended. In addition, examination of the lens via slit lamp examination is recommended for all operators involved in interventional procedures with the current levels of radiation exposure.

Indexed as

Medical StaffSurgeonsCataractHumansOccupational ExposureRadiation DosageRadiation ExposureRadiation InjuriesRiskInterventional radiologyIonizing radiationLens opacitiesOccupational cataractOccupational exposureRadiation protection

Identifiers

PMID30478501
OpenAlexW2902776336

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.