Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30478497›Full record

ReviewDer Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft2019

[Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty in complex eyes].

B Bachmann, S Schrittenlocher, M Matthaei, S Siebelmann, C Cursiefen

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. [DMEK in complicated cases of bullous keratopathy after multiple intraocular surgeries].Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. [Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty DMEK - Donor and recipient step by step].Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft · 2020
    Review
  10. [Explantation of two historical posterior chamber phakic intraocular lenses 31 years after implantation].Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

B BachmannZentrum für Augenheilkunde, Universität zu Köln, Kerpenerstr. 62, 50924, Köln, Deutschland. bjoern.bachmann@uk-koeln.de.
S SchrittenlocherZentrum für Augenheilkunde, Universität zu Köln, Kerpenerstr. 62, 50924, Köln, Deutschland.
M MatthaeiZentrum für Augenheilkunde, Universität zu Köln, Kerpenerstr. 62, 50924, Köln, Deutschland.
S SiebelmannZentrum für Augenheilkunde, Universität zu Köln, Kerpenerstr. 62, 50924, Köln, Deutschland.
C CursiefenZentrum für Augenheilkunde, Universität zu Köln, Kerpenerstr. 62, 50924, Köln, Deutschland.
University of Cologne · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDescemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) has become the standard surgical treatment for Fuchs' endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD) in Germany. In addition to classical FECD, there are endothelial disorders amenable to DMEK associated with complex changes in the anterior segment of the eye, such as anterior synechia of the iris, larger iris defects, after glaucoma surgery, after vitrectomy and after trauma.

objectiveThis article provides an overview of the possibilities to treat patients with complex anterior segment situations in the presence of corneal endothelial decompensation with DMEK. MATERIAL AND

methodsDescription of problems and current surgical techniques when performing DMEK in complex situations.

resultsReconstruction of the iris or the iris/lens diaphragm often needs to be performed either simultaneously or in a previous operation to treat patients with complex anterior segment alterations with DMEK. Both very shallow and very deep anterior chambers pose a major problem. A DMEK graft from older donors (above 70 years) is prone to less rolling and should be preferred in patients with a deep anterior chamber (e.g. after vitrectomy). The graft size should also be adapted to the available space, e. g. a smaller graft diameter should be selected for eyes with anterior synechia.

conclusionThere are only a few evaluations of DMEK under complex conditions; however, it appears that the rate of secondary graft failure, endothelial cell loss and the rebubbling rate are increased in this very heterogeneous group of diseases. Further studies are needed to identify risk factors for a negative progression after DMEK in "complex" eyes.

Indexed as

Descemet Stripping Endothelial KeratoplastyFuchs' Endothelial DystrophyCell CountDescemet MembraneEndothelium, CornealGermanyHumansRetrospective StudiesVisual AcuityCorneal endotheliumDMEKFuchs’ endothelial corneal dystrophyIris defectsTransplant

Identifiers

PMID30478497
OpenAlexW2902139174

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.