Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30478496›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of clinical pharmacy2019

Impact of deprescribing rounds on discharge prescriptions: an interventional trial.

Rachel Edey, Nicholas Edwards, Jonah Von Sychowski, Ajay Bains, Jim Spence, Dan Martinusen

Abstract readClinical Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of clinical pharmacy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Medication Use Quality and Safety in Older Adults: 2023 Update.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Attitudes toward deprescribing for hospital inpatients.Clinical medicine (London, England) · 2022
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Observational
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Deprescribing practices in Canada: A scoping review.Canadian pharmacists journal : CPJ = Revue des pharmaciens du Canada : RPC
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Rachel EdeyDepartment of Pharmacy, Nanaimo Regional General Hospital, 1200 Dufferin Crescent, Nanaimo, BC, V9S 2B7, Canada. Rachel.Edey@viha.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5277-5030
Nicholas EdwardsFaculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, The University of British Columbia, 2405 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z3, Canada.
Jonah Von SychowskiInternal Medicine, Royal Jubilee Hospital, 1952 Bay St, Victoria, BC, V8R 1J8, Canada.
Ajay BainsDepartment of Pharmacy, Royal Jubilee Hospital, 1952 Bay St, Royal Block 242, Victoria, BC, V8R 1J8, Canada.
Jim SpenceInternal Medicine, Royal Jubilee Hospital, 1952 Bay St, Victoria, BC, V8R 1J8, Canada.
Dan MartinusenFaculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, The University of British Columbia, 2405 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z3, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Successful deprescribing practices are required to address issues associated with polypharmacy but are hindered by minimal interprofessional collaboration, time constraints, concern for negative outcomes, and absence of a systematic and evidence-based approach. Objective Determine the impact of pharmacist-led deprescribing rounds within a clinical teaching unit (CTU) the number of home medications discontinued upon hospital discharge. Setting Canadian tertiary care hospital. Methods Prospective, dual-arm, interventional study conducted in a single centre, from November 23rd, 2015 to August 30th, 2016. All patients ≥ 19 years old admitted under the CTU were considered for enrolment if on medication(s) prior to admission and patients were excluded if not taking any medications. Study arm allocation alternated daily between the two teams. The control arm operated as per standard whereas the intervention arm's pharmacist used a deprescribing guide and medication review to identify medications eligible for discontinuation prior to discussing during daily rounds. Discharge documents communicated medication changes to patient and primary healthcare providers. The study was sufficiently powered. Main outcome measure The difference of number of home medications discontinued at discharge between the intervention and control groups. Results 171 and 187 patients were allocated to the intervention and control arms, respectively. No significant differences of baseline characteristics existed between groups. Main outcome measure results showed that deprescribing rounds resulted in significantly more medications deprescribed compared to control (65% vs. 38%; p = 0.001). The rates of readmission and emergency department visits were reduced in the intervention arm. Conclusions Incorporating deprescribing rounds into routine care led to significantly greater discontinuation of medications without increasing rate of emergency department visits or hospital admissions.Trial registration ISRCTN11751440.

Indexed as

DeprescriptionsPolypharmacyAdultAgedFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansInternal MedicineMaleMiddle AgedPatient AdmissionPatient DischargePharmacistsPrescription DrugsProfessional RoleProspective StudiesPrescription DrugsCanadaClinical medication reviewsDeprescribingInappropriate medication useInterprofessional collaborationPatient carePharmacistPolypharmacy

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.