Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30478493›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical pharmacy2019

Translation and validation of a tool to assess the impact of clinical pharmacists' interventions.

Dominik Stämpfli, Pascal Baumgartner, Fabienne Boeni, Pierrick Bedouch, Markus L Lampert, Kurt E Hersberger

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical pharmacy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Dominik StämpfliDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Basel, Klingelbergstrasse 50, 4056, Basel, Switzerland. dominik.staempfli@unibas.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5293-134X
Pascal BaumgartnerDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Basel, Klingelbergstrasse 50, 4056, Basel, Switzerland.
Fabienne BoeniDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Basel, Klingelbergstrasse 50, 4056, Basel, Switzerland.
Pierrick BedouchDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy TIMC-IMAG/CNRS (UMR5525), University Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France.
Markus L LampertDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Basel, Klingelbergstrasse 50, 4056, Basel, Switzerland.
Kurt E HersbergerDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Basel, Klingelbergstrasse 50, 4056, Basel, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background The tool CLEO in French language is designed for estimating the potential relevance of pharmacists' interventions (PIs) in three independent dimensions with regard to process-related, clinical, economic, and humanistic impact. Objective We aimed to translate CLEO into German (CLEO

Indexed as

Professional RoleTranslationsFeasibility StudiesHumansMedication ErrorsPharmacistsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesClassificationCLEO ToolClinical pharmacyClinical relevanceDrug-related problemsInterrater reliabilityPharmacists’ interventionsTranslation

Identifiers

PMID30478493

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.