Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30478489›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical pharmacy2019

The impact of an infectious disease expert team on outpatient parenteral antimicrobial treatment in the Netherlands.

Roos Wijnakker, Loes E Visser, Emile F Schippers, Leo G Visser, Nathalie D van Burgel, Cees van Nieuwkoop

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical pharmacy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Roos WijnakkerDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands. r.wijnakker@lumc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0337-2630
Loes E VisserDepartment of Hospital Pharmacy, Haga Teaching Hospital, The Hague, The Netherlands.
Emile F SchippersDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Leo G VisserDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Nathalie D van BurgelDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Haga Teaching Hospital, The Hague, The Netherlands.
Cees van NieuwkoopDepartment of Internal Medicine, Haga Teaching Hospital, The Hague, The Netherlands.
Leiden University Medical Center · NLHaga Hospital · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background There is increasing interest in outpatient parenteral antimicrobial treatment. Objective To evaluate the added value of consultation of an infectious diseases expert team (consisting of two internist-infectious diseases specialists and a microbiologist) for advice regarding type, administration route and duration of antibiotic treatment. Setting A retrospective case series was performed at the Haga Teaching Hospital, a 700-bed regional teaching hospital in The Hague, The Netherlands. Methods Complication rate and mortality was evaluated during 60 days of follow-up. Therapeutic rationality regarding outpatient parenteral antimicrobial treatment was determined by presenting randomly selected paper cases from the database to two independent infectious diseases specialists who were blinded to patient's treatment and outcomes. The concordance between the two advices were analysed using Cohen's kappa. For those with discordance, an infectious diseases expert team meeting was organized to reach consensus. The final recommendation was compared to the actual given antibiotic treatment. Main outcome measure Discrepancy between the infectious disease expert team recommendations upon type, administration route and duration of antibiotics and the real outpatient parenteral antimicrobial treatment practice. Results Out of 89 included cases, 50 were randomly selected for review by the infectious diseases specialists. The kappa statistic regarding antimicrobial policy was 0.581 (P < 0.001). In 78% (39/50 cases), they had complete agreement upon all aspects of antibiotic treatment. The remaining 11 cases were reviewed by the expert team. Comparing the consensus of 50 cases to actual practice, in 14(28%) cases there was a discrepancy suggesting potential room for improvement. Comparing the cases in whom an individual infectious diseases specialist was involved in real practice to those cases without, there was 18% versus 42% discrepancy with the recommendations of the expert team (OR 3.4; 95% CI: 0.9-12.5, P = 0.06). Complication rate was 19% including unplanned readmissions and side effects of antimicrobial agent or administration route. Conclusion Though outpatient parenteral antimicrobial treatment policies in the Netherlands appear to be safe, consultation of an ID expert team, rather than an individual ID specialist, has the potential to optimize antimicrobial treatment in patients considered suitable for outpatient parenteral antimicrobial treatment.

Indexed as

Administration, IntravenousAdministration, OralAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAmbulatory CareAnti-Infective AgentsCommunicable DiseasesExpert TestimonyFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHospitals, TeachingHumansMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsAnti-Infective AgentsAntimicrobial stewardshipExpert ConsultationHome treatmentInfectious diseasesOPATOutpatientsThe Netherlands

Identifiers

PMID30478489
PMCPMC6394504
OpenAlexW2903312446

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.