Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30478479›Full record

ArticleJournal of digital imaging2019

Beyond Human Perception: Sexual Dimorphism in Hand and Wrist Radiographs Is Discernible by a Deep Learning Model.

Sehyo Yune, Hyunkwang Lee, Myeongchan Kim, Shahein H Tajmir, Michael S Gee, Synho Do

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of digital imaging, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. The Use of Artificial Intelligence in Dentistry Practices.The Eurasian journal of medicine · 2022
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sehyo YuneDepartment of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 25 New Chardon Street Suite 400B, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
Hyunkwang LeeDepartment of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 25 New Chardon Street Suite 400B, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
Myeongchan KimDepartment of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 25 New Chardon Street Suite 400B, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
Shahein H TajmirDepartment of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 25 New Chardon Street Suite 400B, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
Michael S GeeDepartment of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 25 New Chardon Street Suite 400B, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
Synho DoDepartment of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 25 New Chardon Street Suite 400B, Boston, MA, 02114, USA. sdo@mgh.harvard.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the well-established impact of sex and sex hormones on bone structure and density, there has been limited description of sexual dimorphism in the hand and wrist in the literature. We developed a deep convolutional neural network (CNN) model to predict sex based on hand radiographs of children and adults aged between 5 and 70 years. Of the 1531 radiographs tested, the algorithm predicted sex correctly in 95.9% (κ = 0.92) of the cases. Two human radiologists achieved 58% (κ = 0.15) and 46% (κ = - 0.07) accuracy. The class activation maps (CAM) showed that the model mostly focused on the 2nd and 3rd metacarpal base or thumb sesamoid in women, and distal radioulnar joint, distal radial physis and epiphysis, or 3rd metacarpophalangeal joint in men. The radiologists reviewed 70 cases (35 females and 35 males) labeled with sex along with heat maps generated by CAM, but they could not find any patterns that distinguish the two sexes. A small sample of patients (n = 44) with sexual developmental disorders or transgender identity was selected for a preliminary exploration of application of the model. The model prediction agreed with phenotypic sex in only 77.8% (κ = 0.54) of these cases. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study that demonstrated a machine learning model to perform a task in which human experts could not fulfill.

Indexed as

Deep LearningSex CharacteristicsAdolescentAdultAgedChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHandHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMaleMiddle AgedRadiographyWristYoung AdultArtificial intelligenceBone developmentMachine learningSexual developmentSexual dimorphism

Identifiers

PMID30478479
PMCPMC6646498

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.