Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30478410›Full record

ArticleNeuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology2019

Blockade of muscarinic acetylcholine receptors facilitates motivated behaviour and rescues a model of antipsychotic-induced amotivation.

Jonathan M Hailwood, Christopher J Heath, Benjamin U Phillips, Trevor W Robbins, Lisa M Saksida, Timothy J Bussey

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Abuse of tropicamide eye drops: review of clinical data.Revista brasileira de psiquiatria (Sao Paulo, Brazil : 1999) · 2022
    Review
  7. Article
  8. MPharmacology research & perspectives · 2022
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Effects of muscarinic MNeuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Jonathan M HailwoodDepartment of Psychology and Behavioural and Clinical Neuroscience Institute, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge, CB2 3EB, UK. jmh241@cam.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5835-2143
Christopher J HeathSchool of Life, Health and Chemical Sciences, The Open University, Walton Hall, Milton Keynes, MK7 6AA, UK.
Benjamin U PhillipsDepartment of Psychology and Behavioural and Clinical Neuroscience Institute, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge, CB2 3EB, UK.
Trevor W RobbinsDepartment of Psychology and Behavioural and Clinical Neuroscience Institute, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge, CB2 3EB, UK.
Lisa M SaksidaMolecular Medicine Research Group, Robarts Research Institute & Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, ON, Canada.
Timothy J BusseyDepartment of Psychology and Behavioural and Clinical Neuroscience Institute, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge, CB2 3EB, UK.
University of Cambridge · GBWestern University · CAThe Open University · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council 1505392Medical Research Council (MRC) 1505392National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research NC/N001451/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Disruptions to motivated behaviour are a highly prevalent and severe symptom in a number of neuropsychiatric and neurodegenerative disorders. Current treatment options for these disorders have little or no effect upon motivational impairments. We assessed the contribution of muscarinic acetylcholine receptors to motivated behaviour in mice, as a novel pharmacological target for motivational impairments. Touchscreen progressive ratio (PR) performance was facilitated by the nonselective muscarinic receptor antagonist scopolamine as well as the more subtype-selective antagonists biperiden (M1) and tropicamide (M4). However, scopolamine and tropicamide also produced increases in non-specific activity levels, whereas biperiden did not. A series of control tests suggests the effects of the mAChR antagonists were sensitive to changes in reward value and not driven by changes in satiety, motor fatigue, appetite or perseveration. Subsequently, a sub-effective dose of biperiden was able to facilitate the effects of amphetamine upon PR performance, suggesting an ability to enhance dopaminergic function. Both biperiden and scopolamine were also able to reverse a haloperidol-induced deficit in PR performance, however only biperiden was able to rescue the deficit in effort-related choice (ERC) performance. Taken together, these data suggest that the M1 mAChR may be a novel target for the pharmacological enhancement of effort exertion and consequent rescue of motivational impairments. Conversely, M4 receptors may inadvertently modulate effort exertion through regulation of general locomotor activity levels.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntipsychotic AgentsApathyBehavior, AnimalBiperidenCognitive DysfunctionDisease Models, AnimalHaloperidolMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMotivationMuscarinic AntagonistsPsychomotor PerformanceReceptor, Muscarinic M1Receptor, Muscarinic M4ScopolamineAntipsychotic AgentsBiperidenHaloperidolMuscarinic AntagonistsReceptor, Muscarinic M1Receptor, Muscarinic M4ScopolamineTropicamide

Identifiers

PMID30478410
PMCPMC6397643
OpenAlexW2900630721

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.