Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30478343›Full record

ArticleNature communications2018

Characterisation of the British honey bee metagenome.

Tim Regan, Mark W Barnett, Dominik R Laetsch, Stephen J Bush, David Wragg, Giles E Budge, Fiona Highet, Benjamin Dainat, Joachim R de Miranda, Mick Watson and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Genome drafts ofMicrobiology resource announcements · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Shotgun Metagenomics Reveals Minor Micro"International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Tim ReganThe Roslin Institute and Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush, EH25 9RG, Edinburgh, UK. tim.regan@roslin.ed.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0979-7875
Mark W BarnettThe Roslin Institute and Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush, EH25 9RG, Edinburgh, UK.
Dominik R LaetschThe Institute of Evolutionary Biology, School of Biological Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH9 3JG, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7887-0186
Stephen J BushThe Roslin Institute and Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush, EH25 9RG, Edinburgh, UK.
David WraggThe Roslin Institute and Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush, EH25 9RG, Edinburgh, UK.
Giles E BudgeFera, The National Agrifood Innovation Campus, Sand Hutton, YO41 1LZ, York, UK.
Fiona HighetScience and Advice for Scottish Agriculture, 1 Roddinglaw Road, Edinburgh, EH12 9FJ, UK.
Benjamin DainatAgroscope, Swiss Bee Research Centre, Schwarzenburgstrasse 161, CH-3003, Bern, Switzerland.
Joachim R de MirandaDepartment of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, 750 07, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0335-0386
Mick WatsonThe Roslin Institute and Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush, EH25 9RG, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4211-0358
Mark BlaxterThe Institute of Evolutionary Biology, School of Biological Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH9 3JG, UK. mark.blaxter@ed.ac.uk.
Tom C FreemanThe Roslin Institute and Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush, EH25 9RG, Edinburgh, UK. tfreeman@roslin.ed.ac.uk.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/I001107/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/D/20211550Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/D/20211551Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/D/20211552Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/D/20211554
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The European honey bee (Apis mellifera) plays a major role in pollination and food production. Honey bee health is a complex product of the environment, host genetics and associated microbes (commensal, opportunistic and pathogenic). Improved understanding of these factors will help manage modern challenges to bee health. Here we used DNA sequencing to characterise the genomes and metagenomes of 19 honey bee colonies from across Britain. Low heterozygosity was observed in many Scottish colonies which had high similarity to the native dark bee. Colonies exhibited high diversity in composition and relative abundance of individual microbiome taxa. Most non-bee sequences were derived from known honey bee commensal bacteria or pathogens. However, DNA was also detected from additional fungal, protozoan and metazoan species. To classify cobionts lacking genomic information, we developed a novel network analysis approach for clustering orphan DNA contigs. Our analyses shed light on microbial communities associated with honey bees and demonstrate the power of high-throughput, directed metagenomics for identifying novel biological threats in agroecosystems.

Indexed as

MetagenomeAnimalsBeesContig MappingGenetic VariationMetagenomicsMicrobiotaSequence Analysis, DNASymbiosisUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID30478343
PMCPMC6255801

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.