Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30478323›Full record

ArticleNature methods2018

Found In Translation: a machine learning model for mouse-to-human inference.

Rachelly Normand, Wenfei Du, Mayan Briller, Renaud Gaujoux, Elina Starosvetsky, Amit Ziv-Kenet, Gali Shalev-Malul, Robert J Tibshirani, Shai S Shen-Orr

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature methods, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Rachelly NormandRappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel.
Wenfei DuDepartment of Statistics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Mayan BrillerRappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel.
Renaud GaujouxRappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel.
Elina StarosvetskyRappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel.
Amit Ziv-KenetRappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel.
Gali Shalev-MalulRappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel.
Robert J TibshiraniDepartment of Statistics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Shai S Shen-OrrRappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel. shenorr@technion.ac.il.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6991-7736

Funding

New Statistical Methods for Medical Signals and ImagesR01EB001988 · NIBIB · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI JOHNSTONE, IAIN M · 2003 to 2018
$6.1M
(PQ2) PD-L1/PD-1 signals in aged hosts undergoing cancer immunotherapyR01CA231325 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI CURIEL, TYLER J., SHEN-ORR, SHAI SHLOMO · 2018 to 2022
$3.1M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA231325NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB001988
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cross-species differences form barriers to translational research that ultimately hinder the success of clinical trials, yet knowledge of species differences has yet to be systematically incorporated in the interpretation of animal models. Here we present Found In Translation (FIT; http://www.mouse2man.org ), a statistical methodology that leverages public gene expression data to extrapolate the results of a new mouse experiment to expression changes in the equivalent human condition. We applied FIT to data from mouse models of 28 different human diseases and identified experimental conditions in which FIT predictions outperformed direct cross-species extrapolation from mouse results, increasing the overlap of differentially expressed genes by 20-50%. FIT predicted novel disease-associated genes, an example of which we validated experimentally. FIT highlights signals that may otherwise be missed and reduces false leads, with no experimental cost.

Indexed as

Gene Expression ProfilingMachine LearningTranscriptomeTranslational Research, BiomedicalAlgorithmsAnimalsCase-Control StudiesFemaleGenomicsHumansInflammatory Bowel DiseasesMaleMiceMiddle AgedSignal Transduction

Identifiers

PMID30478323
PMCPMC12396630

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.