ArticleScientific reports2018
Using Frameshift Peptide Arrays for Cancer Neo-Antigens Screening.
Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Intercepting Premalignant, Preinvasive Breast Lesions Through Vaccination.Frontiers in immunology · 2021Pooled it
- Neoantigen prediction and computational perspectives towards clinical benefit: recommendations from the ESMO Precision Medicine Working Group.Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology · 2020Pooled it
- Article
- Peptide Arrays as Tools for Unraveling Tumor Microenvironments and Drug Discovery in Oncology.Cells · 2026Review
- Vaccines for cancer prevention: exploring opportunities and navigating challenges.Nature reviews. Drug discovery · 2025Review
- Immuno-informatics voyage through molecular mimicry of Heat Shock Proteins: Potential IBD immunopathogenesis.PloS one · 2025Article
- Predicting response and toxicity to immune checkpoint inhibitors in lung cancer using antibodies to frameshift neoantigens.Journal of translational medicine · 2023Article
- Vaccines for immunoprevention of DNA mismatch repair deficient cancers.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2022Review
- Production of high-complexity frameshift neoantigen peptide microarrays.RSC advances · 2020Article
- Comparison of personal and shared frameshift neoantigen vaccines in a mouse mammary cancer model.BMC immunology · 2020Article
- Progress in Neoantigen Targeted Cancer Immunotherapies.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
It has been demonstrated that DNA mutations generating neo-antigens are important for an effective immune response to tumors as evident from recent clinical studies of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Further, it was shown that frameshift peptides (FSP) generated in tumors from insertions and deletions (INDELs) of microsatellites (MS) in coding region are a very good correlate of positive response to PD1 treatment. However, these types of DNA-sourced FSPs are infrequent in cancer. We hypothesize that tumors may also generate FSPs in transcription errors through INDELs in MS or by exon mis-splicing. Since there are a finite number of predictable sequences of such possible FSPs in the genome, we propose that peptide arrays with all possible FSPs could be used to analyze antibody reactivity to FSPs in patient sera as a FS neo-antigen screen. If this were the case it would facilitate finding common tumor neoantigens for cancer vaccines. Here we test this proposal using an array of 377 predicted FS antigens. The results of screening 9 types of dog cancer sera indicate that cancer samples had significantly higher antibody responses against FSPs than non-cancer samples. Both common reactive FSPs and cancer-type specific immune responses were detected. In addition, the protection of a common reactive FSP was tested in mouse tumor models, comparing to the non-reactive FSPs. The mouse homologs non-reactive FSPs did not offer protection in either the mouse melanoma or breast cancer models while the reactive FSP did in both models. The tumor protection was positively correlated to antibody response to the FSP. These data suggest that FSP arrays could be used for cancer neo-antigen screening.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.