Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30478264›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of impotence research2019

Complications of glans penis augmentation.

Sun Tae Ahn, Tae Il Kwak, Kwang Sung Park, Je Jong Kim, Du Geon Moon

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of impotence research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Surgical treatment of premature ejaculation: a narrative review.International journal of impotence research · 2024
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. New trend in medicine: aesthetic genital surgery.International journal of impotence research · 2022
    Article
  9. Glans penis augmentation: when, how, and why?International journal of impotence research · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Sun Tae AhnDepartment of Urology, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Tae Il KwakDepartment of Urology, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Kwang Sung ParkDepartment of Urology, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Republic of Korea.
Je Jong KimDepartment of Urology, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Du Geon MoonDepartment of Urology, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea. dgmoon@korea.ac.kr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9031-9845
Korea University · KRChonnam National University Hospital · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the controversy regarding penile augmentation (PA), glans penis augmentation (GPA) is used in penile reconstructive surgery in selected patients with small glans penis. Since 2003, injectable hyaluronic acid (HA) gel has been used for GPA. The attractiveness of HA gel fillers and interest in this technique have led to the use of other fillers for GPA, particularly irreversible fillers that improve the longevity of HA gels. Conversely, indirect glans augmentation via implantation of dermofat grafts or scaffolds between the corpus spongiosum and the distal tip of the corpus cavernosum is used to overcome poor longevity of the gel and glans surface undulation, which are the primary limitations of GPA using HA gel. Unfortunately, these implants form hard painful lumps over time in most patients and are difficult to remove. Blunt dissection is an invasive procedure that may cause vascular compromise and consequent glans necrosis in a few patients. We present our review regarding the current status of GPA for a more comprehensive understanding of this subject. Additionally, we have discussed a few complicated cases that were referred to us.

Indexed as

HumansMalePatient SatisfactionPenisUrologic Surgical Procedures, Male

Identifiers

PMID30478264
OpenAlexW2902505823

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.