Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30478123›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2018

Improving household surveys and use of data to address health inequities in three Asian cities: protocol for the Surveys for Urban Equity (SUE) mixed methods and feasibility study.

Helen Elsey, Ak Narayan Poudel, Tim Ensor, Tolib Mirzoev, James Nicholas Newell, Joseph Paul Hicks, Christopher Cartwright, David Wong, Caroline Tait, Sushil Baral and 15 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Data, Social Determinants, and Better Decision-making for Health: the 3-D Commission.Journal of urban health : bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine · 2021
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors.

Helen ElseyNuffield Centre for International Health and Development, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Ak Narayan PoudelNuffield Centre for International Health and Development, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Tim EnsorNuffield Centre for International Health and Development, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Tolib MirzoevNuffield Centre for International Health and Development, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
James Nicholas NewellNuffield Centre for International Health and Development, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Joseph Paul HicksNuffield Centre for International Health and Development, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Christopher CartwrightNuffield Centre for International Health and Development, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
David WongNuffield Centre for International Health and Development, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Caroline TaitNuffield Centre for International Health and Development, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Sushil BaralHealth Research and Social Development Forum-International, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Radheshyam BhattaraiHealth Research and Social Development Forum-International, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Sudeepa KhanalHealth Research and Social Development Forum-International, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Rajeev DhungelHealth Research and Social Development Forum-International, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Subash GajurelHealth Research and Social Development Forum-International, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Shraddha ManandharHelen Keller International, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Saidur MashrekyCentre for Injury Prevention and Research Bangladesh (CIPRB), Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Junnatul FerdoushCentre for Injury Prevention and Research Bangladesh (CIPRB), Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Rumana HuqueAdvancement through Research and Knowledge (ARK Foundation), Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Tarana FerdousAdvancement through Research and Knowledge (ARK Foundation), Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Shammi NasreenAdvancement through Research and Knowledge (ARK Foundation), Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Hoang Van MinhCentre for Population Health Sciences, Hanoi University of Public Health (HUPH), Hanoi, Vietnam.
Duong Minh DucCentre for Population Health Sciences, Hanoi University of Public Health (HUPH), Hanoi, Vietnam.
Bao NgocCentre for Population Health Sciences, Hanoi University of Public Health (HUPH), Hanoi, Vietnam.
Dana ThomsonFlowminder Foundation, Stockholm, Sweden.
Hilary WallaceSchool of Medicine, University of Notre Dame, Fremantle, Western Australia, Australia.

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/P024718/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAs rapid urbanisation transforms the sociodemographic structures within cities, standard survey methods, which have remained unchanged for many years, under-represent the urban poorest. This leads to an overly positive picture of urban health, distorting appropriate allocation of resources between rural and urban and within urban areas. Here, we present a protocol for our study which (i) tests novel methods to improve representation of urban populations in household surveys and measure mental health and injuries, (ii) explores urban poverty and compares measures of poverty and 'slumness' and (iii) works with city authorities to understand, and potentially improve, utilisation of data on urban health for planning more equitable services. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will conduct household surveys in Kathmandu, Hanoi and Dhaka to test novel methods: (i) gridded population sampling; (ii) enumeration using open-access online maps and (iii) one-stage versus two-stage cluster sampling. We will test reliability of an observational tool to categorise neighbourhoods as slum areas. Within the survey, we will assess the appropriateness of a short set of questions to measure depression and injuries. Questionnaire data will also be used to compare asset-based, consumption-based and income-based measures of poverty. Participatory methods will identify perceptions of wealth in two communities in each city. The analysis will combine quantitative and qualitative findings to recommend appropriate measures of poverty in urban areas. We will conduct qualitative interviews and establish communities of practice with government staff in each city on use of data for planning. Framework approach will be used to analyse qualitative data allowing comparison across city settings. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approvals have been granted by ethics committees from the UK, Nepal, Bangladesh and Vietnam. Findings will be disseminated through conference papers, peer-reviewed open access articles and workshops with policy-makers and survey experts in Kathmandu, Hanoi and Dhaka.

Indexed as

Health Status DisparitiesSurveys and QuestionnairesAdultAgedAsiaCross-Sectional StudiesFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPublic Health SurveillanceSocioeconomic FactorsUrban PopulationYoung Adultcity planningdepressionhousehold survey methodsinjuriesurban slum

Identifiers

PMID30478123
PMCPMC6254496

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.