Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30478108›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2018

Surgical quality in organ procurement during day and night: an analysis of quality forms.

Jacob de Boer, Koen Van der Bogt, Hein Putter, Kirsten Ooms-de Vries, Bernadette Haase-Kromwijk, Robert Pol, Jeroen De Jonge, Kees Dejong, Mijntje Nijboer, Daan Van der Vliet and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Ten Years of Quality Monitoring of Abdominal Organ Procurement in the Netherlands and Its Impact on Transplant Outcome.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Jacob de BoerDepartment of Surgery, Leids Universitair Medisch Centrum, Leiden, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1200-532X
Koen Van der BogtDepartment of Surgery, Leids Universitair Medisch Centrum, Leiden, Netherlands.
Hein PutterLeids Universitair Medisch Centrum, Statistical Department, Leiden, Netherlands.
Kirsten Ooms-de VriesNederlandse Transplantatie Stichting, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Bernadette Haase-KromwijkNederlandse Transplantatie Stichting, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Robert PolDepartment of Surgery, Universitair Medisch Centrum Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
Jeroen De JongeDepartment of Surgery, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Kees DejongDepartment of Surgery, Maastricht Universitair Medisch Centrum+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Mijntje NijboerDepartment of Surgery, Leids Universitair Medisch Centrum, Leiden, Netherlands.
Daan Van der VlietDepartment of Surgery, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Dries BraatDepartment of Surgery, Leids Universitair Medisch Centrum, Leiden, Netherlands.
Leiden University Medical Center · NLErasmus MC · NLMaastricht University Medical Centre · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NLUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo analyse a potential association between surgical quality and time of day.

designA retrospective analysis of complete sets of quality forms filled out by the procuring and accepting surgeon on organs from deceased donors.

settingProcurement procedures in the Netherlands are organised per region. All procedures are performed by an independent, dedicated procurement team that is associated with an academic medical centre in the region.

participantsIn 18 months' time, 771 organs were accepted and procured in The Netherlands. Of these, 17 organs were declined before transport and therefore excluded. For the remaining 754 organs, 591 (78%) sets of forms were completed (procurement and transplantation). Baseline characteristics were comparable in both daytime and evening/night-time with the exception of height (p=0.003). PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE: All complete sets of quality forms were retrospectively analysed for the primary outcome, procurement-related surgical injury. Organs were categorised based on the starting time of the procurement in either daytime (8:00-17:00) or evening/night-time (17:00-8:00).

resultsOut of 591 procured organs, 129 organs (22%) were procured during daytime and 462 organs (78%) during evening/night-time. The incidence of surgical injury was significantly lower during daytime; 22 organs (17%) compared with 126 organs (27%) procured during evening/night-time (p=0.016). This association persists when adjusted for confounders.

conclusionsThis study shows an increased incidence of procurement-related surgical injury in evening/night-time procedures as compared with daytime. Time of day might (in)directly influence surgical performance and should be considered a potential risk factor for injury in organ procurement procedures.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedFemaleGraft SurvivalHumansMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsQuality of Health CareRetrospective StudiesTime FactorsTissue and Organ HarvestingYoung Adultquality In health carerisk managementsurgerytransplant surgery

Identifiers

PMID30478108
PMCPMC6254412
OpenAlexW2902447403

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.