ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2019
Evaluating science communication.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed.
- Enhancing Science Communication through Deliberative Discussions on Water Contamination in a General Chemistry Lab at an HBCU.Journal of chemical education · 2026Article
- Authors' academic but not personal expertise or gender affect message credibility in science communication.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Bridging functional bionanomaterials and the clinic: strategic communication as a translational enabler.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2026Review
- Climate change perspectives in Lithuania: exploring science attitudes and personality correlations.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Unpacking the Risk of Misinformation: A Communication-Based Critique.Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis · 2025Article
- Information sampling and Bayesian belief formation in statistical judgment.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Problematic use of sustainability claims in recent scientific literature on crop gene technologies: toward improving practices and communication.The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2025Review
- Evidence-based recommendations for communicating the impacts of climate change on health.Translational behavioral medicine · 2022Article
- Creating Effective, Evidence-Based Video Communication of Public Health Science (COVCOM Study): Protocol for a Sequential Mixed Methods Effect Study.JMIR research protocols · 2022Article
- Article
- Building Blocks of Virtuous Science Communication: Grant Funding, Policy Making, and Public Engagement.DNA and cell biology · 2022Article
- Article
- A survey to gather perspectives of DBT/Wellcome Trust India Alliance-funded researchers on public engagement with science.Wellcome open research · 2021Article
- Article
- The Evolving Field of Risk Communication.Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis · 2020Article
- Article
- Interactive youth science workshops benefit student participants and graduate student mentors.PLoS biology · 2020Article
- Communicative and Social Skills among Medical Students in Spain: A Descriptive Analysis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Article
- Mathematical Models for COVID-19 Pandemic: A Comparative Analysis.Journal of the Indian Institute of Science · 2020Review
- The Science of Science Communication III.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Effective science communication requires assembling scientists with knowledge relevant to decision makers, translating that knowledge into useful terms, establishing trusted two-way communication channels, evaluating the process, and refining it as needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.