ArticleCancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society2018
Mono, bi- and tri-exponential diffusion MRI modelling for renal solid masses and comparison with histopathological findings.
Article in Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Quantitative Analysis With Time-Dependent Diffusion MRI for Assessing WHO/ISUP Tumor Grade in Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma.Korean journal of radiology · 2025Article
- Understanding disciplinary perspectives: a framework to develop skills for interdisciplinary research collaborations of medical experts and engineers.BMC medical education · 2024Article
- Clinical T1/2 renal cell carcinoma: multiparametric dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI features-based model for the prediction of individual adverse pathology.World journal of surgical oncology · 2024Article
- Comparison of conventional diffusion-weighted imaging and intravoxel incoherent motion in differentiating between chromophobe renal cell carcinoma and renal oncocytoma: a preliminary study.The British journal of radiology · 2024Article
- Application of diffusion kurtosis tensor MR imaging in characterization of renal cell carcinomas with different pathological types and grades.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2021Article
- Evidence of Tri-Exponential Decay for Liver Intravoxel Incoherent Motion MRI: A Review of Published Results and Limitations.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Combinative evaluation of primary tumor and lymph nodes to predict pelvic lymphatic metastasis in cervical cancer: an integrated PET-IVIM MRI study.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2020Article
- An overview of non-invasive imaging modalities for diagnosis of solid and cystic renal lesions.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo compare diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM), and tri-exponential models of the diffusion magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) signal for the characterization of renal lesions in relationship to histopathological findings.
methodsSixteen patients planned to undergo nephrectomy for kidney tumour were scanned before surgery at 3 T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), with T
resultsThirteen solid lesions (nine clear cell carcinomas, two papillary renal cell carcinoma, one haemangioma and one oncocytoma) and four cysts were included. The mean MD of solid lesions are significantly (p < 0.05) lower than healthy cortex and medulla, (1.94 ± 0.32*10
conclusionParameters derived from a two- or three-component fit of the diffusion signal are sensitive to histopathological features of kidney lesions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.