ArticleMicrobiome2018
Skin and gut microbiomes of a wild mammal respond to different environmental cues.
Article in Microbiome, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
44 citing papers in PubMed.
- Skin microbiota of fallow deer: Composition, diversity, and influencing factors.Veterinary research communications · 2026Article
- Timing Is Everything: The Effect of Exposure to Pollution on Wildlife Gut Microbiota Is Contingent on Season.Molecular ecology · 2026Article
- A lagging recovery: the delayed restoration of gut microbial diversity in Rhinolophus sinicus post-hibernation.Animal microbiome · 2026Article
- Characterising the gut microbiomes of two baleen whales with different feeding and migratory strategies.Animal microbiome · 2026Article
- Variation in the early-life interdigital skin microbiota of lambs in a commercial sheep flock.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2026Article
- Advancing Yeast Identification Using High-Throughput DNA Barcode Data From a Curated Culture Collection.Molecular ecology resources · 2026Article
- The golden jackal (Canis aureus): interaction of fur and fecal microbiota, host genetics and animal traits.Animal microbiome · 2025Article
- Population and Spatial Features Impact the Gut Phageome-Bacteriome Structure and Interactions in a Mammal Species Living in Fragmented Habitats.Microbial ecology · 2025Article
- Unravelling Intrinsic and Extrinsic Factors Shaping the Rich Communities on Lizard Skin.Environmental microbiology reports · 2025Article
- Association between Capillaria hepatica infection-induced alterations in gut microbiota and estrogen expression in Brandt's voles (Lasiopodomys brandtii).BMC veterinary research · 2025Article
- Diet-microbiome coevolution: the core mechanism for semi-aquatic adaptation and cross-habitat niche coexistence of the web-footed shrew (Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
- Skin, but not gut, microbial communities vary with social density in Antarctic fur seals.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
- Host selection and influencing factors of parasitic fleas on the body surface of desert rodents, Inner Mongolia, China.International journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2024Article
- Seasonal shifts and land-use impact: unveiling the gut microbiomes of bank voles (Myodes glareolus) and common voles (Microtus arvalis).FEMS microbiology ecology · 2024Article
- Characterising the Tasmanian devil (Sarcophilus harrisii) pouch microbiome in lactating and non-lactating females.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Tolerance to environmental pollution in the freshwater crustacean Asellus aquaticus: A role for the microbiome.Environmental microbiology reports · 2024Article
- Exploring Alashan Ground Squirrel (Spermophilus alashanicus) Diversity: Metagenomic and Transcriptomic Datasets from the Helan Mountains.Scientific data · 2024Article
- Environmental radiation exposure at Chornobyl has not systematically affected the genomes or chemical mutagen tolerance phenotypes of local worms.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024Article
- Neurobiology of Pathogen Avoidance and Mate Choice: Current and Future Directions.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024Review
- AnimalMetaOmics: a multi-omics data resources for exploring animal microbial genomes and microbiomes.Nucleic acids research · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAnimal skin and gut microbiomes are important components of host fitness. However, the processes that shape the microbiomes of wildlife are poorly understood, particularly with regard to exposure to environmental contaminants. We used 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing to quantify how exposure to radionuclides impacts the skin and gut microbiota of a small mammal, the bank vole Myodes glareolus, inhabiting areas within and outside the Chernobyl Exclusion Zone (CEZ), Ukraine.
resultsSkin microbiomes of male bank voles were more diverse than females. However, the most pronounced differences in skin microbiomes occurred at a larger spatial scale, with higher alpha diversity in the skin microbiomes of bank voles from areas within the CEZ, whether contaminated by radionuclides or not, than in the skin microbiomes of animals from uncontaminated locations outside the CEZ, near Kyiv. Similarly, irrespective of the level of radionuclide contamination, skin microbiome communities (beta diversity) showed greater similarities within the CEZ, than to the areas near Kyiv. Hence, bank vole skin microbiome communities are structured more by geography than the level of soil radionuclides. This pattern presents a contrast with bank vole gut microbiota, where microbiomes could be strikingly similar among distant (~ 80 km of separation), uncontaminated locations, and where differences in microbiome community structure were associated with the level of radioactivity. We also found that the level of (dis)similarity between the skin and gut microbiome communities from the same individuals was contingent on the potential for exposure to radionuclides.
conclusionsBank vole skin and gut microbiomes have distinct responses to similar environmental cues and thus are structured at different spatial scales. Our study shows how exposure to environmental pollution can affect the relationship between a mammalian host's skin and gut microbial communities, potentially homogenising the microbiomes in habitats affected by pollution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.