Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30477524›Full record

ArticleHuman resources for health2018

Functioning and time utilisation by female multi-purpose health workers in South India: a time and motion study.

Samiksha Singh, Neha Dwivedi, Amol Dongre, Pradeep Deshmukh, Deepak Dey, Vijay Kumar, Sanjeev Upadhyaya

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human resources for health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Perception and Experiences of Auxiliary Nurse Midwives in using the ANMOL Application: A Qualitative Study Based on Training Needs.Indian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Samiksha SinghIndian Institute of Public Health-Hyderabad, Public Health Foundation of India, Plot #1, Amar co-op society, Kavuri Hills, Madhapur, Hyderabad, 500033, India. samiksha.singh@iiphh.org.ORCID 0000-0001-9441-0657
Neha DwivediUNICEF Hyderabad Field Office, Hyderabad, India.
Amol DongreDepartment of Community Medicine, Sri Manakula Vinayagar Medical College and Hospital, Pondicherry, India.
Pradeep DeshmukhDepartment of Community Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Nagpur, India.
Deepak DeyUNICEF Hyderabad Field Office, Hyderabad, India.
Vijay KumarCentre for Economic and Social Studies (CESS), Hyderabad, India.
Sanjeev UpadhyayaUNICEF Hyderabad Field Office, Hyderabad, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAuxillary nurse midwives (ANMs) are the most important frontline multi-purpose workers in rural India. This study was conducted to assess the spectrum of service delivery, time utilisation, work planning, and factors affecting functioning of ANMs in South India.

methodsWe conducted a time and motion study in three districts across two states in South India. The districts selected in such a manner that they had a considerable tribal population. We conducted multi-stage sampling to select ANMs. We directly observed 43 ANMs consecutively for six working days and in-depth interviewed all selected ANMs, their supervisors, medical officers, and district health officials. We conducted an FGD to substantiate the findings from observations and interviews. Observation findings were analysed under three broad domains: (i) programme activities, (ii) programme support activities, and (iii) other work. Time spent was calculated in median (interquartile range, IQR) minutes/ANM per week or day. Qualitative data were coded and analysed using grounded theory, and appropriate themes and sub-themes were identified.

resultsANMs worked for median 7 h a day (7:10 h, non-tribal; 6:20 h, tribal). There is variation in the hours of work, the pattern of service provided and time utilisation across days of a week. ANMs spent 60% of their on-job time on programmatic activities (median 22:38 h; IQR, 20:48-27:01 h) in a week. Emphasis is more on home visits, universal immunisation, antenatal care, school health, and seasonal diseases. ANMs spent negligible time on non-communicable diseases, adolescent health, nutrition, etc. ANMs spent the remaining time in program support activities, such as meetings with seniors, community meetings, and other non-health related work. There are no renewed job description, work plans, and supervision guidelines, even with newly added programs and tasks. ANMs prioritised work as per the priorities set by the supervisors and leaders. Health administration often disrupts the regular functioning of ANMs for training, meetings and other ad hoc work.

conclusionANMs are overworked; they often multi-task and fail to deliver efficiently. The administration needs to re-assess the workload. The administration may reduce expected work, provide strong supervisory support, and make conscious efforts to pose fewer disruptions in regular working of ANMs.

Indexed as

Community Health ServicesCommunity Health WorkersDelivery of Health CareNurse MidwivesRural Health ServicesRural PopulationWorkAdolescentAdultChildEthnicityFemaleGrounded TheoryHome Care ServicesHumansImmunizationCommunity health servicesHealth workersIndiaMulti-purpose health workersPersonnel managementTime and motion study

Identifiers

PMID30477524
PMCPMC6258406

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.