Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30477517›Full record

ArticleReproductive health2018

Evaluation of a quality improvement intervention for labour and birth care in Brazilian private hospitals: a protocol.

Jacqueline Alves Torres, Maria do Carmo Leal, Rosa Maria Soares Madeira Domingues, Ana Paula Esteves-Pereira, Andreza Rodrigues Nakano, Maysa Luduvice Gomes, Ana Claudia Figueiró, Marcos Nakamura-Pereira, Elaine Fernandes Viellas de Oliveira, Bárbara Vasques da Silva Ayres and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reproductive health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Jacqueline Alves TorresAgência Nacional de Saúde Suplementar, Av. Augusto Severo, 84 - Glória, Diretoria de Desenvolvimento Setorial, Rio de Janeiro - RJ, 20021-040, Brazil. Jacqueline.torres@ans.gov.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0567-2952
Maria do Carmo LealEscola Nacional de Saúde Pública Sergio Arouca, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Rosa Maria Soares Madeira DominguesInstituto Nacional de Infectologia Evandro Chagas, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Ana Paula Esteves-PereiraEscola Nacional de Saúde Pública Sergio Arouca, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Andreza Rodrigues NakanoCasa de Oswaldo Cruz, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Maysa Luduvice GomesFaculdade de Enfermagem da Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Ana Claudia FigueiróEscola Nacional de Saúde Pública Sergio Arouca, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Marcos Nakamura-PereiraInstituto Nacional de Saúde da Mulher, da Criança e do Adolescente Fernandes Figueira, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Elaine Fernandes Viellas de OliveiraEscola Nacional de Saúde Pública Sergio Arouca, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Bárbara Vasques da Silva AyresEscola Nacional de Saúde Pública Sergio Arouca, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Jane SandallDepartment of Women and children's Health, King's College London, London, England.
José M BelizánInstitute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy (IECS), Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Zulmira HartzInstituto de Higiene e Medicina Tropical, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal.

Funding

Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation OPP1142172
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn Brazilian private hospitals, caesarean section (CS) is almost universal (88%) and is integrated into the model of birth care. A quality improvement intervention, "Adequate Birth" (PPA), based on four driving components (governance, participation of women and families, reorganisation of care, and monitoring), has been implemented to help 23 hospitals reduce their CS rate. This is a protocol designed to evaluate the implementation of PPA and its effectiveness at reducing CS as a primary outcome of birth care.

methodsCase study of PPA intervention conducted in 2017/2018. We integrated quantitative and qualitative methods into data collection and analysis. For the quantitative stage, we selected a convenient sample of twelve hospitals. In each of these hospitals, we included 400 women. This resulted in a total sample of 4800 women. We used this sample to detect a 2.5% reduction in CS rate. We interviewed managers and puerperal women, and extracted data from hospital records. In the qualitative stage, we evaluated a subsample of eight hospitals by means of systematic observation and semi-structured interviews with managers, health professionals and women. We used specific forms for each of the four PPA driving components. Forms for managers and professionals addressed the decision-making process, implemented strategies, participatory process in strategy design, and healthcare practice. Forms for women and neonatal care addressed socio-economic, demographic and health condition; prenatal and birth care; tour of the hospital before delivery; labour expectation vs. real experience; and satisfaction with care received. We will estimate the degree of implementation of PPA strategies related to two of the four driving components: "participation of women and families" and "reorganisation of care". We will then assess its effect on CS rate and secondary outcomes for each of the twelve selected hospitals, and for the total sample. To allow for clinical, socio-demographic and obstetric characteristics in women, we will conduct multivariate analysis. Additionally, we will evaluate the influence of internal context variables (the PPA driving components "governance" and "monitoring") on the degree of implementation of the components "participation of women and families" and "reorganisation of care", by means of thematic content analysis. This analysis will include both quantitative and qualitative data. DISCUSSION: The effectiveness of quality improvement interventions that reduce CS rates requires examination. This study will identify strategies that could promote healthier births.

Indexed as

Decision MakingHospitals, PrivateLabor, ObstetricPerinatal CareQuality ImprovementBrazilCesarean SectionFemaleHumansPregnancyCaesarean sectionHealth evaluationImplementation researchMaternal and child healthParturition

Identifiers

PMID30477517
PMCPMC6257968

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.