Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30477492›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2018

Barriers and facilitators to the integration of mental health services into primary healthcare: a qualitative study among Ugandan primary care providers using the COM-B framework.

Edith K Wakida, Celestino Obua, Godfrey Z Rukundo, Samuel Maling, Zohray M Talib, Elialilia S Okello

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Edith K WakidaDepartment of Psychiatry, Mbarara University of Science and Technology, P. O. Box 1410, Mbarara, Uganda. ediwakida@must.ac.ug.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6949-8474
Celestino ObuaDepartment of Pharmacology and Therapeutics and Vice Chancellor, Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara, Uganda.
Godfrey Z RukundoDepartment of Psychiatry, Mbarara University of Science and Technology, P. O. Box 1410, Mbarara, Uganda.
Samuel MalingDepartment of Psychiatry, Mbarara University of Science and Technology, P. O. Box 1410, Mbarara, Uganda.
Zohray M TalibDepartment of Medical Education, California University of Science and Medicine, San Bernadino, California, USA.
Elialilia S OkelloDepartment of Psychiatry, Makerere University College of Health Sciences, Kampala, Uganda.

Funding

Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (Sida) and Makerere University SE-0-SE-6-5118006001-UGA-43082
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUptake of clinical guideline recommendations into routine practice requires changes in attitudes and behaviors of the health care providers. The World Health Organization (WHO) has heavily invested in public health and health promotion globally by developing policy recommendations to guide clinical practice; however, clinical guidelines are often not applied. The success of the implementation of any guidelines depends on consideration of existing barriers and adequately addressing them. Therefore, exploring the context specific barriers and facilitators affecting the primary care providers (PCPs) in Mbarara district, Uganda may provide a practical way of addressing the identified barriers thus influence the PCPs action towards integration of mental healthcare services into PHC.

methodsWe adopted a theoretical model of behavior change; Capability, Opportunity and Motivation developed to understand behavior (COM-B). This was a cross-sectional study which involved using a semi-structured qualitative interview guide to conduct in-depth interviews with PCP's (clinical officers, nurses and midwives).

resultsCapability - inadequacy in knowledge about mental disorders; more comfortable managing patients with a mental problem diagnosis than making a new one; knowledge about mental health was gained during pre-service training; no senior cadre to consultations in mental health; and burdensome to consult the Uganda Clinical Guidelines (UCG). Opportunity - limited supply of hard copies of the UCG; guidelines not practical for local setting; did not regularly deal with clients having mental illness to foster routine usage of the UCG; no sensitization about the UCG to the intended users; and no cues at the health centers to remind the PCPs to use UCG. Motivation - did not feel self-reliant; not seen the UCG at their health facilities; lack of trained mental health specialists; conflicting priorities; and no regulatory measures to encourage screening for mental health.

conclusionsEfforts to achieve successful integration of mental health services into PHC need to fit in the context of the implementers; thus the need to adapt the UCG into local context, have cues to enforce implementation, and optimize the available expertize (mental healthcare providers) in the process.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelClinical CompetenceHealth PersonnelMotivationAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGuideline AdherenceHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMental DisordersMental Health ServicesMiddle AgedModels, PsychologicalPractice Guidelines as TopicCapabilityIntegration of mental health servicesOpportunity and motivationPrimary care providersUganda clinical guidelines

Identifiers

PMID30477492
PMCPMC6258411

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.