Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30477309›Full record

Trial reportAmerican journal of rhinology & allergy2019

NAVIGATE I: Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Trial of the Exhalation Delivery System With Fluticasone for Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps.

Raj Sindwani, Joseph K Han, Daniel F Soteres, John C Messina, Jennifer L Carothers, Ramy A Mahmoud, Per G Djupesland

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in American journal of rhinology & allergy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
7.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 80 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Effectiveness of the exhalation delivery system with fluticasone for treating chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Acute Exacerbations of Chronic Rhinosinusitis.Current allergy and asthma reports · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Understanding the CRSwNP Patient as Whole.American journal of rhinology & allergy · 2023
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Pharmacology, particle deposition and drug administration techniques of intranasal corticosteroids for treating allergic rhinitis.Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2022
    Review
  20. International consensus statement on allergy and rhinology: Olfaction.International forum of allergy & rhinology · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Raj Sindwani1 Head and Neck Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
Joseph K Han2 Department of Otolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, Virginia.
Daniel F Soteres3 Asthma & Allergy Associates, Colorado Springs, Colorado.
John C Messina4 OptiNose US, Inc., Yardley, Pennsylvania.
Jennifer L Carothers4 OptiNose US, Inc., Yardley, Pennsylvania.
Ramy A Mahmoud4 OptiNose US, Inc., Yardley, Pennsylvania.
Per G Djupesland5 OptiNose AS, Oslo, Norway.
OptiNose (United States) · USCleveland Clinic · USEastern Virginia Medical School · USOptiNose (Norway) · NOUniversity of Colorado Colorado Springs · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChronic rhinosinusitis is a common, high-morbidity chronic inflammatory disease, and patients often experience suboptimal outcomes with current medical treatment. The exhalation delivery system with fluticasone (EDS-FLU) may improve care by increasing superior/posterior intranasal corticosteroid deposition.

objectiveTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of EDS-FLU versus EDS-placebo in patients with nasal polyps (NP). Coprimary end points were change in nasal congestion and polyp grade. Key secondary end points were Sino-Nasal Outcome Test-22 (SNOT-22) and Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale-Revised (MOS Sleep-R). Other prespecified end points included all 4 cardinal symptoms of NP, 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC), Rhinosinusitis Disability Index (RSDI), and key indicators for surgical intervention.

designRandomized, double-blind, EDS-placebo-controlled, multicenter study.

methodsThree hundred twenty-three subjects with NP and moderate-severe congestion/obstruction, most with history of corticosteroid use (94.4%) and/or prior surgery (60.4%), were randomized to EDS-FLU 93 µg, 186 µg, or 372 µg or EDS-placebo twice daily (BID) for 24 weeks (16 double-blind + 8 single-arm extension with EDS-FLU 372 µg BID).

resultsAll EDS-FLU doses produced significant improvement in both coprimary end points ( P < .05) and in SNOT-22 total score ( P ≤ .005). EDS-FLU significantly improved all 4 cardinal symptoms of NP ( P < .05), including congestion/obstruction, facial pain/pressure, rhinorrhea/post-nasal drip, and hyposmia/anosmia. Approximately 80% of subjects reported improvement with EDS-FLU, with 65% reporting "much" or "very much" improvement by week 16. Adverse events were generally local in nature and similar to other intranasal steroids studied for similar durations in similar populations, with the most common being epistaxis.

conclusionsIn patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with NP (CRSwNP) who were symptomatic despite high rates of prior intranasal steroid use and/or surgery, EDS-FLU produced statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvements compared to EDS-placebo in multiple subjective and objective outcomes (symptoms, SNOT-22, RSDI, SF-36, PGIC, and NP grade), including all 4 cardinal symptoms of CRSwNP.

Indexed as

AdultChronic DiseaseDouble-Blind MethodDrug Delivery SystemsExhalationFemaleFluticasoneHumansMaleMiddle AgedNasal ObstructionNasal PolypsNeoplasm GradingPlacebo EffectRhinitisSinusitisFluticasonechronic rhinosinusitiscongestionfluticasoneinflammatory diseaseintranasal corticosteroidintranasal steroidsnasal polypsobstructionpolyp gradeSino-Nasal Outcome Test-22sinus surgery

Identifiers

PMID30477309
PMCPMC6604249
OpenAlexW2902583043

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.