Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30477122›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of environmental research and public health2018

Assessing Health Vulnerabilities and Adaptation to Climate Change: A Review of International Progress.

Peter Berry, Paddy M Enright, Joy Shumake-Guillemot, Elena Villalobos Prats, Diarmid Campbell-Lendrum

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. A Review of the Applicability of Current Green Practices in Healthcare Facilities.International journal of health policy and management · 2023
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Conceptualising Climate Vulnerability in Health Sciences Through Scenario-Based Learning.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Progress of Local Health Department Planning Actions for Climate Change: Perspectives from California, USA.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Peter BerryFaculty of Environment, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada. pberry@uwaterloo.ca.
Paddy M EnrightFaculty of Environment, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada. pmenright@uwaterloo.ca.
Joy Shumake-GuillemotWMO/WHO Climate and Health Office, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland. jshumake-guillemot@wmo.int.
Elena Villalobos PratsClimate Change and Health Unit, WHO, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland. villalobose@who.int.ORCID 0000-0001-7638-8433
Diarmid Campbell-LendrumClimate Change and Health Unit, WHO, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland. campbelllendrumd@who.int.

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Climate change is increasing risks to human health and to the health systems that seek to protect the safety and well-being of populations. Health authorities require information about current associations between health outcomes and weather or climate, vulnerable populations, projections of future risks and adaptation opportunities in order to reduce exposures, empower individuals to take needed protective actions and build climate-resilient health systems. An increasing number of health authorities from local to national levels seek this information by conducting climate change and health vulnerability and adaptation assessments. While assessments can provide valuable information to plan for climate change impacts, the results of many studies are not helping to build the global evidence-base of knowledge in this area. They are also often not integrated into adaptation decision making, sometimes because the health sector is not involved in climate change policy making processes at the national level. Significant barriers related to data accessibility, a limited number of climate and health models, uncertainty in climate projections, and a lack of funding and expertise, particularly in developing countries, challenge health authority efforts to conduct rigorous assessments and apply the findings. This paper examines the evolution of climate change and health vulnerability and adaptation assessments, including guidance developed for such projects, the number of assessments that have been conducted globally and implementation of the findings to support health adaptation action. Greater capacity building that facilitates assessments from local to national scales will support collaborative efforts to protect health from current climate hazards and future climate change. Health sector officials will benefit from additional resources and partnership opportunities to ensure that evidence about climate change impacts on health is effectively translated into needed actions to build health resilience.

Indexed as

Climate ChangeAdaptation, PsychologicalGlobal HealthHumansInternationalityVulnerable Populationsadaptationadaptive capacityclimate change and healthclimate resilient health systemsvulnerability assessment

Identifiers

PMID30477122
PMCPMC6313539

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.