Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30476999›Full record

Trial reportJAMA neurology2019

Effect of Cerebellar Stimulation on Gait and Balance Recovery in Patients With Hemiparetic Stroke: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Giacomo Koch, Sonia Bonnì, Elias Paolo Casula, Marco Iosa, Stefano Paolucci, Maria Concetta Pellicciari, Alex Martino Cinnera, Viviana Ponzo, Michele Maiella, Silvia Picazio and 2 more

5 registry-linked trialsOpen access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA neurology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 5 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 139 papers, 22 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
139citing papers in PubMed, 22 pooled it
6.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03456362 nacompletednot on this map

Promoting Motor Recovery in Patients With Stroke by Enhancing Cerebellar-cortical Plasticity: a Randomized Double Blinded Controlled Repetitive TMS Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorI.R.C.C.S. Fondazione Santa LuciaRan2014 to 2017Enrolled40ConditionsStroke, Gait, HemiplegicArmsREPETITIVE TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION
NCT05478434 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Cortico-cortical Stimulation and Robot-assisted Therapy a New Approach of Upper Limb Functional Recovery After Stroke

TypeinterventionalSponsorI.R.C.C.S. Fondazione Santa LuciaRan2022 to 2025Enrolled32ConditionsStroke, Stroke, IschemicArmsCortico-cortical stimulation plus robot-assisted therapy, Sham cortico-cortical stimulation plus robot-assisted therapy
NCT05588661 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Comparative Effects of Perturbation Based Balance Training and Whole Body Vibration on Balance and Gait in Sub-acute Stroke Patients.

TypeinterventionalSponsorRiphah International UniversityRan2022 to 2022Enrolled28ConditionsStrokeArmsPerturbation Exercises, Whole Body Vibration
NCT06911671 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Innovative Upper Limb Stroke Rehabilitation Approach Combining Myoelectric Control Assistance in Virtual Reality and Cerebellar TBS Plasticity Enhancement

TypeinterventionalSponsorI.R.C.C.S. Fondazione Santa LuciaRan2025 to 2027Enrolled45ConditionsStroke, Stroke, CardiovascularArmsVirtual Reality Interface + Cerebellar iTBS (c-iTBS), Virtual Reality + Sham Cerebellar iTBS (sham c-iTBS), Physical Therapy
NCT07073235 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Neuroplastic Changes and Effects of Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation (iTBS) on Motor Recovery of Upper and Lower Extremity in Chronic Stroke Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorDanderyd HospitalRan2025 to 2030Enrolled56ConditionsStroke, Hemiparesis After Stroke, Chronic Stroke Patients, HemiplegiaArmsIntermittent Theta Burst Stimulation, Sham Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

139 citing papers in PubMed, 22 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 231 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Effectiveness of intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) on Post-Stroke motor dysfunction: A Meta-Analysis of randomized controlled trials.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Theta-burst stimulation as a therapeutic tool in neurological pathology: a systematic review.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2024
    Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Pooled it
  15. Pooled it
  16. Pooled it
  17. Pooled it
  18. Pooled it
  19. Pooled it
  20. Pooled it

79 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Giacomo KochNon Invasive Brain Stimulation Unit/Department of Behavioral and Clinical Neurology, Santa Lucia Foundation IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Sonia BonnìNon Invasive Brain Stimulation Unit/Department of Behavioral and Clinical Neurology, Santa Lucia Foundation IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Elias Paolo CasulaNon Invasive Brain Stimulation Unit/Department of Behavioral and Clinical Neurology, Santa Lucia Foundation IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Marco IosaClinical Laboratory of Experimental Neurorehabilitation, Santa Lucia Foundation IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Stefano PaolucciClinical Laboratory of Experimental Neurorehabilitation, Santa Lucia Foundation IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Maria Concetta PellicciariNon Invasive Brain Stimulation Unit/Department of Behavioral and Clinical Neurology, Santa Lucia Foundation IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Alex Martino CinneraNon Invasive Brain Stimulation Unit/Department of Behavioral and Clinical Neurology, Santa Lucia Foundation IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Viviana PonzoNon Invasive Brain Stimulation Unit/Department of Behavioral and Clinical Neurology, Santa Lucia Foundation IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Michele MaiellaNon Invasive Brain Stimulation Unit/Department of Behavioral and Clinical Neurology, Santa Lucia Foundation IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Silvia PicazioNon Invasive Brain Stimulation Unit/Department of Behavioral and Clinical Neurology, Santa Lucia Foundation IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Fabrizio SallustioStroke Unit, Department of Neuroscience, Tor Vergata Policlinic, Rome, Italy.
Carlo CaltagironeNon Invasive Brain Stimulation Unit/Department of Behavioral and Clinical Neurology, Santa Lucia Foundation IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Fondazione Santa Lucia · ITPoliclinico Tor Vergata · ITUniversity of Rome Tor Vergata · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Gait and balance impairment is associated with poorer functional recovery after stroke. The cerebellum is known to be strongly implicated in the functional reorganization of motor networks in patients with stroke, especially for gait and balance functions. Objective: To determine whether cerebellar intermittent θ-burst stimulation (CRB-iTBS) can improve balance and gait functions in patients with hemiparesis due to stroke. Design, Setting, Participants: This randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled phase IIa trial investigated efficacy and safety of a 3-week treatment of CRB-iTBS coupled with physiotherapy in promoting gait and balance recovery in patients with stroke. Thirty-six patients with consecutive ischemic chronic stroke in the territory of the contralateral middle cerebral artery with hemiparesis were recruited from a neuro-rehabilitation hospital. Participants were screened and enrolled from March 2013 to June 2017. Intention-to-treat analysis was performed. Interventions: Patients were randomly assigned to treatment with CRB-iTBS or sham iTBS applied over the cerebellar hemisphere ipsilateral to the affected body side immediately before physiotherapy daily during 3 weeks. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the between-group difference in change from baseline in the Berg Balance Scale. Secondary exploratory measures included the between-group difference in change from baseline in Fugl-Meyer Assessment scale, Barthel Index, and locomotion assessment with gait analysis and cortical activity measured by transcranial magnetic stimulation in combination with electroencephalogram. Results: A total of 34 patients (mean [SD] age, 64 [11.3] years; 13 women [38.2%]) completed the study. Patients treated with CRB-iTBS, but not with sham iTBS, showed an improvement of gait and balance functions, as revealed by a pronounced increase in the mean (SE) Berg Balance Scale score (baseline: 34.5 [3.4]; 3 weeks after treatment: 43.4 [2.6]; 3 weeks after the end of treatment: 47.5 [1.8]; P < .001). No overall treatment-associated differences were noted in the Fugl-Meyer Assessment (mean [SE], baseline: 163.8 [6.8]; 3 weeks after treatment: 171.1 [7.2]; 3 weeks after the end of treatment: 173.5 [6.9]; P > .05) and Barthel Index scores (mean [SE], baseline: 71.1 [4.92]; 3 weeks after treatment: 88.8 [2.1]; 3 weeks after the end of treatment: 92.2 [2.4]; P > .05). Patients treated with CRB-iTBS, but not sham iTBS, showed a reduction of step width at the gait analysis (mean [SE], baseline: 16.8 [4.8] cm; 3 weeks after treatment: 14.3 [6.2] cm; P < .05) and an increase of neural activity over the posterior parietal cortex. Conclusions and Relevance: Cerebellar intermittent θ-burst stimulation promotes gait and balance recovery in patients with stroke by acting on cerebello-cortical plasticity. These results are important to increase the level of independent walking and reduce the risk of falling. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03456362.

Indexed as

AgedBrain IschemiaCerebellumCombined Modality TherapyDouble-Blind MethodFemaleGait Disorders, NeurologicHumansMaleMiddle AgedMiddle Cerebral ArteryParesisPlacebosPostural BalanceStrokeStroke RehabilitationPlacebos

Identifiers

PMID30476999
PMCPMC6439971
OpenAlexW2902367961

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.