Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30476950›Full record

ArticleJAMA cardiology2018

Association of Transcatheter Mitral Valve Repair With Quality of Life Outcomes at 30 Days and 1 Year: Analysis of the Transcatheter Valve Therapy Registry.

Suzanne V Arnold, Zhuokai Li, Sreekanth Vemulapalli, Suzanne J Baron, Michael J Mack, Andrzej S Kosinski, Matthew R Reynolds, James B Hermiller, John S Rumsfeld, David J Cohen

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA cardiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Quality of life after percutaneous paravalvular leak closure - a prospective registry.Postepy w kardiologii interwencyjnej = Advances in interventional cardiology · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Outcomes of transcatheter mitral valve repair for secondary mitral regurgitation by severity of left ventricular dysfunction.EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Suzanne V ArnoldSaint Luke's Mid America Heart Institute, Kansas City, Missouri.
Zhuokai LiDuke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Sreekanth VemulapalliDuke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Suzanne J BaronSaint Luke's Mid America Heart Institute, Kansas City, Missouri.
Michael J MackBaylor Scott and White Health, Plano, Texas.
Andrzej S KosinskiDuke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Matthew R ReynoldsLahey Hospital and Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
James B HermillerSaint Vincent Medical Center, Indianapolis, Indiana.
John S RumsfeldUniversity of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora.
David J CohenSaint Luke's Mid America Heart Institute, Kansas City, Missouri.

Funding

Optimal Decision Making in Aortic Valve ReplacementK23HL116799 · NHLBI · SAINT LUKE'S HOSPITAL · PI ARNOLD, SUZANNE VICTORIA · 2014 to 2018
$635k
NHLBI NIH HHS K23 HL116799
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Improvements in symptoms, functional capacity, and quality of life are among the key goals of edge-to-edge transcatheter mitral valve repair (TMVR) for mitral regurgitation. Objective: To examine health status outcomes among patients undergoing TMVR in clinical practice and the factors associated with improvement. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study used the Society of Thoracic Surgeons/American College of Cardiology Transcatheter Valve Therapy Registry, which contains data on patients with severe mitral regurgitation treated with TMVR from 2013 through 2017 in 217 US hospitals. Main Outcomes and Measures: Change in disease-specific health status (Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire-Overall Summary score [KCCQ-OS]; range 0-100 points, with higher scores indicating better health status) at 30 days and 1 year after TMVR. We also examined factors associated with health status at 30 days after TMVR, by means of multivariable linear regression using a generalized estimating equations approach to account for clustering of patients within sites. Results: The KCCQ data were available in 81.2% at baseline, 69.3% of survivors at 30 days, and 47.4% of survivors at 1 year. Among 4226 patients who underwent TMVR, survived 30 days, and completed the KCCQ at baseline and follow-up, the KCCQ-OS increased from 41.9 before TMVR to 66.7 at 30 days (mean change 24.8 [95% CI, 24.0-25.6] points; P < .001), representing a large clinical improvement. The KCCQ scores remained stable from 30 days to 1 year after TMVR, with no further significant increase or decline. On multivariable analysis, atrial fibrillation (-2.2 [95% CI, -3.7 to -0.6] points; P = .01), permanent pacemaker (-2.1 [95% CI, -3.7 to -0.4] points; P = .01), severe lung disease (-3.9 [95% CI, -6.2 to -1.5] points; P = .001), home oxygen (-2.7 [95% CI, -4.9 to -0.4] points; P = .02), and lower KCCQ scores at baseline (3.9 points for each 10-point increase [95% CI, 3.6-4.2]; P < .001) were independently associated with lower 30-day KCCQ-OS scores. In-hospital renal failure was uncommon but was also associated with significant reductions in 30-day KCCQ-OS scores (-7.3 [95% CI -13.3 to -1.2] points). In estimates calculated with inverse probability weighting, after 1 year after TMVR, 54.2% (95% CI 52.2%-56.1%) of patients were alive and well; 23.0% had died, 21.9% had persistently poor health status (KCCQ-OS <60 points), 5.5% had a health status decline from baseline, and 4.6% had both poor health status and health status decline. Conclusions and Relevance: In a national cohort of US patients undergoing edge-to-edge TMVR in clinical practice, health status was impaired prior to the procedure, improved within 30 days, and remained stable through 1 year among surviving patients with available data. While long-term mortality remains high, most surviving patients demonstrate improvements in symptoms, functional status, and quality of life, with only modest differences by patient-level factors.

Indexed as

Health StatusQuality of LifeRegistriesAgedAged, 80 and overCardiac CatheterizationFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHeart Valve Prosthesis ImplantationHumansMaleMitral ValveMitral Valve InsufficiencyRetrospective StudiesTime FactorsTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID30476950
PMCPMC6583100

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.