ArticleNeuroImage2019
Neural activity in human visual cortex is transformed by learning real world size.
Article in NeuroImage, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Functional magnetic resonance imaging of depression: a bibliometrics and meta-analysis.Annals of general psychiatry · 2024Article
- What drives the automatic retrieval of real-world object size knowledge?Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance · 2024Article
- Do sparse brain activity patterns underlie human cognition?NeuroImage · 2022Article
- Familiar size affects the perceived size and distance of real objects even with binocular vision.Journal of vision · 2021Article
- Screen size matches of familiar images are biased by canonical size, rather than showing a memory size effect.Psychological research · 2021Article
- Influences on memory for naturalistic visual episodes: sleep, familiarity, and traits differentially affect forms of recall.Learning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.) · 2020Article
- SNCA rs11931074 polymorphism correlates with spontaneous brain activity and motor symptoms in Chinese patients with Parkinson's disease.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The way that our brain processes visual information is directly affected by our experience. Repeated exposure to a visual stimulus triggers experience-dependent plasticity in the visual cortex of many species. Humans also have the unique ability to acquire visual knowledge through instruction. We introduced human participants to the real-world size of previously unfamiliar species, and to the functional motion of novel tools, during a functional magnetic resonance imaging scan. Using machine learning, we compared activity patterns evoked by images of the new items, before and after participants learned the animals' real-world size or tools' motion. We found that, after acquiring size information, participants' visual activity patterns for the new animals became more confusable with activity patterns evoked by similar-sized known animals in early visual cortex, but not in ventral temporal cortex, reflecting an influence of new size knowledge on posterior, but not anterior, components of the ventral stream. In contrast, learning the functional motion of new tools did not lead to an equivalent change in recorded activity. Finally, the time-points marked by evidence of new size information in early visual cortex were more likely to show size information and greater activation in the right angular gyrus, a key hub of semantic knowledge and spatial cognition. Overall, these findings suggest that learning an item's real-world size by instruction influences subsequent activity in visual cortex and in a region that is central to semantic and spatial brain systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.