Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30476520›Full record

ArticleBiological psychology2019

Sympathetic responding to unconditioned stimuli predicts subsequent threat expectancy, orienting, and visuocortical bias in human aversive Pavlovian conditioning.

L Forest Gruss, Andreas Keil

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biological psychology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

L Forest GrussCenter for the Study of Emotion and Attention, Department of Psychology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA; Department of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA. Electronic address: forest.gruss@vanderbilt.edu.
Andreas KeilCenter for the Study of Emotion and Attention, Department of Psychology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.

Funding

Acquisition and extinction of affective bias in perception: A single trial approaR01MH097320 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI DING, MINGZHOU, KEIL, ANDREAS · 2012 to 2016
$1.7M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH097320
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Threat expectancy is the ability to predict an aversive outcome. What is not known is the influence of initial threat responding on the acquisition of verbal, attentional and perceptual biases towards conditioned threat cues. This study evaluated the extent to which initial unconditioned stimulus (UCS) responding was related to trial-by-trial self-reported expectancy, sensory processing (visuocortical EEG) and orienting (heart rate deceleration) to threat cues during extinction learning. Participants (n = 38) viewed oriented Gabor gratings, associated with the presence (CS+) or absence (CS-) of a 96 dB white noise (UCS), flickering at 12 Hz to elicit steady state visually evoked potentials (ssVEPs). Multivariate multiple regression revealed greater initial UCS skin conductance responding to predict extinction responding: enhanced visuocortical discrimination, greater heart rate deceleration to CS+, and greater threat expectancy endorsements. These results suggest that the motivational intensity of initial threat reactivity (sympathetic UCS responding) drives learning-induced defensive dispositions across multiple response systems.

Indexed as

Conditioning, ClassicalDefense MechanismsAdultAffectAttentional BiasCuesElectroencephalographyEvoked Potentials, VisualExtinction, PsychologicalFemaleGalvanic Skin ResponseHeart RateHumansMaleMultivariate AnalysisRegression AnalysisAutonomic physiologyExpectancyPavlovian conditioningssVEPThreat bias

Identifiers

PMID30476520
PMCPMC6343857

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.