Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30476517›Full record

Trial reportOphthalmology2019

Five-Year Follow-up of Nonfibrotic Scars in the Comparison of Age-Related Macular Degeneration Treatments Trials.

Ebenezer Daniel, Gui-Shuang Ying, Benjamin J Kim, Cynthia A Toth, Frederick Ferris, Daniel F Martin, Juan E Grunwald, Glenn J Jaffe, Joshua L Dunaief, Wei Pan and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Ophthalmology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Algorithm of the major and minor diagnostic criteria for active myopic choroidal neovascularization.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2022
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ebenezer DanielScheie Eye Institute, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Electronic address: ebdaniel@pennmedicine.upenn.edu.
Gui-Shuang YingScheie Eye Institute, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Benjamin J KimScheie Eye Institute, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Cynthia A TothDepartment of Ophthalmology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Frederick FerrisNational Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Daniel F MartinNational Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland; Cole Eye Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
Juan E GrunwaldScheie Eye Institute, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Glenn J JaffeDepartment of Ophthalmology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Joshua L DunaiefScheie Eye Institute, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Wei PanScheie Eye Institute, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Maureen G MaguireScheie Eye Institute, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Comparison of Age-Related Macular Degeneration Treatments Trials
Penn Presbyterian Medical Center · USDuke University · USNational Institutes of Health · US

Funding

Scientific TransparencyP30EY001583 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Qi N Cui · 1985 to 2026
$19.5M
Coordinating Center for the Comparison of AMD Treatments TrialsU10EY017823 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI MAGUIRE, MAUREEN G · 2006 to 2012
$19.2M
Photograph Reading Center for the Comparison of AMD Treatment TrialsU10EY017826 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI GRUNWALD, JUAN E · 2006 to 2013
$2.8M
Comparison of AMD Treatment Trials-OCT Reading CenterU10EY017825 · NEI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI JAFFE, GLENN · 2006 to 2013
$2.3M
Chair Grant for the Comparison of AMD Treatment TrialsU10EY017828 · NEI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI MARTIN, DANIEL F · 2006 to 2012
$1.9M
Additional Analyses of the Data from the Comparison of Age-related Macular Degeneration Treatments Trials (CATT) and CATT Follow-up Study (CATT FS)R21EY028998 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI YING, GUI-SHUANG · 2019 to 2020
$458k
Secondary Data Analysis of the Data from Comparison of AMD Treatments TrialsR21EY023689 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI YING, GUI-SHUANG · 2013 to 2014
$436k
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY001583NEI NIH HHS R21 EY023689NEI NIH HHS R21 EY028998NEI NIH HHS U10 EY017823NEI NIH HHS U10 EY017825NEI NIH HHS U10 EY017826NEI NIH HHS U10 EY017828
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo describe changes in visual acuity (VA) and macular morphologic features at 5 years in eyes with nonfibrotic scar (NFS) identified at 1 year in the Comparison of Age-Related Macular Degeneration Treatments Trials (CATT).

designProspective cohort study within a randomized clinical trial.

participantsParticipants in CATT.

methodsParticipants assigned to ranibizumab or bevacizumab and to 1 of 3 dosing regimens were released from the clinical trial protocol after 2 years and recalled at 5 years. Nonfibrotic scar was identified on color images at year 1 as flat, small, well-circumscribed areas of pigmentation with varying degrees of central hypopigmentation without exposure of underlying choroidal vessels at the site of baseline choroidal neovascularization. Follow-up images were assessed for changes in and around NFS.

main outcome measuresPigmentation changes, VA, development of fibrotic scar (FS), nongeographic atrophy (NGA), geographic atrophy (GA), retinal fluid on OCT, and fluorescein leakage.

resultsAmong 474 eyes with images obtained at 1, 2, and 5 years, 39 (8.2%) showed NFS at 1 year with a mean VA of 80 letters (Snellen equivalent, 20/25). Among these eyes, FS developed in 5% at 2 years and 28% at 5 years. Nongeographic atrophy was observed in 34%, 47%, and 65% of eyes at 1, 2, and 5 years, respectively. Geographic atrophy developed in 5% of eyes at 2 years and 21% at 5 years. Among eyes with NFS, FS, or no scar at 1 year, mean VA at 5 years was 73 letters (20/32), 48 letters (20/100), and 62 letters (20/63), respectively. At 5 years, NFS eyes demonstrated less GA, less intraretinal fluid, more subretinal fluid, and less subretinal pigment epithelium fluid (all P < 0.01). Among NFS eyes, mean thickness of the retina, subretinal tissue complex, and total retina did not change across years 1 to 5 (P > 0.50). The proportion of eyes with fluid on OCT also did not change (P = 0.36). Subretinal hyperreflective material disappeared by 5 years in 40% of eyes with NFS.

conclusionsThese results indicate that, on average, eyes with NFS after anti-VEGF treatment have good VA not only at 1 and 2 years, but also through 5 years.

Indexed as

Visual AcuityAngiogenesis InhibitorsBevacizumabCicatrixDisease ProgressionFluorescein AngiographyFollow-Up StudiesFundus OculiHumansIntravitreal InjectionsMacula LuteaMacular DegenerationPrognosisProspective StudiesRanibizumabTime FactorsAngiogenesis InhibitorsBevacizumabRanibizumabVascular Endothelial Growth Factor A

Identifiers

PMID30476517
PMCPMC6475610
OpenAlexW2901441653

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.