Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30476340›Full record

ReviewSchizophrenia bulletin2019

Reassessing "Praecox Feeling" in Diagnostic Decision Making in Schizophrenia: A Critical Review.

Tudi Gozé, Marcin Moskalewicz, Michael A Schwartz, Jean Naudin, Jean-Arthur Micoulaud-Franchi, Michel Cermolacce

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Schizophrenia bulletin, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
28.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Literary case study of psychosis:World journal of psychiatry · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Tudi GozéDepartment of Psychiatry, Psychotherapies, Art Therapy, Toulouse University Hospital, Toulouse, France.
Marcin MoskalewiczThe Oxford Research Centre in the Humanities (TORCH), University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Michael A SchwartzDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Texas A&M Health Science Center, Texas A&M College of Medicine, Round Rock, TX.
Jean NaudinDepartment of Psychiatry, Hôpital Sainte-Marguerite, Aix-Marseilles University, Marseilles, France.
Jean-Arthur Micoulaud-FranchiCNRS, SANPSY, USR 3413, Bordeaux, France.
Michel CermolacceDepartment of Psychiatry, Hôpital Sainte-Marguerite, Aix-Marseilles University, Marseilles, France.
Aix-Marseille Université · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRInserm · FRPoznan University of Medical Sciences · PLTexas A&M Health Science Center · USUniversité Toulouse - Jean Jaurès · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The "Praecox Feeling" (PF) is a classical concept referring to a characteristic feeling of bizarreness experienced by a psychiatrist while encountering a person with schizophrenia. Although the PF used to be considered a core symptom of the schizophrenia spectrum, it fell into disuse since the spread of operationalized diagnostic methods (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders/International Classification of Diseases systems). In contemporary research on schizophrenia, it remains largely unaddressed. This critical review investigates the evolution of the PF in historical and contemporary literature and presents an exhaustive overview of empirical evidence on its prevalence in clinical decision making, its reliability and validity. The review demonstrates that the PF is a real determinant of medical decision making in schizophrenia, although, without further research, there is not enough evidence to sustain its rehabilitation as a reliable and valid clinical criterion. PF-like experiences should not be opposed to any criteriological attitude in diagnosis and would be clinically useful if the conditions of descriptive precaution and rigorous epistemology are maintained. The aim of teaching clinical expertise is to transform this basic experience into a well-founded clinical judgment. Finally, the article discusses the possible relevance of the PF for basic science and clinical research according to a translational approach inspired by phenomenology.

Indexed as

Clinical Decision-MakingIntuitionPhysician-Patient RelationsPsychiatrySchizophrenic PsychologyDiagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental DisordersHumansReproducibility of ResultsSchizophreniadiagnostic judgmentepistemology of psychiatryphenomenologyPraecox Feelingpsychopathologyschizophrenia

Identifiers

PMID30476340
PMCPMC6737542
OpenAlexW2904772735

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.