Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30476198›Full record

ArticleJournal of radiation research2019

Results of a nationwide survey on Japanese clinical practice in breast-conserving radiotherapy for breast cancer.

Norihiro Aibe, Kumiko Karasawa, Masahiko Aoki, Keiko Akahane, Yasuhiro Ogawa, Etsuyo Ogo, Shuichi Kanamori, Jiro Kawamori, Anneyuko I Saito, Kenshiro Shiraishi and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of radiation research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Moderately hypofractionated post-operative radiation therapy for breast cancer: preferences amongst radiation oncologists from countries in Latin America and the Caribbean.Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 12 institutions in 1 country.

Norihiro AibeBreast Cancer Group of the Japanese Radiation Oncology Study Group.
Kumiko KarasawaBreast Cancer Group of the Japanese Radiation Oncology Study Group.
Masahiko AokiBreast Cancer Group of the Japanese Radiation Oncology Study Group.
Keiko AkahaneBreast Cancer Group of the Japanese Radiation Oncology Study Group.
Yasuhiro OgawaBreast Cancer Group of the Japanese Radiation Oncology Study Group.
Etsuyo OgoBreast Cancer Group of the Japanese Radiation Oncology Study Group.
Shuichi KanamoriBreast Cancer Group of the Japanese Radiation Oncology Study Group.
Jiro KawamoriBreast Cancer Group of the Japanese Radiation Oncology Study Group.
Anneyuko I SaitoBreast Cancer Group of the Japanese Radiation Oncology Study Group.
Kenshiro ShiraishiBreast Cancer Group of the Japanese Radiation Oncology Study Group.
Hiroshi SekineBreast Cancer Group of the Japanese Radiation Oncology Study Group.
Seiji TachiiriBreast Cancer Group of the Japanese Radiation Oncology Study Group.
Michio YoshimuraBreast Cancer Group of the Japanese Radiation Oncology Study Group.
Chikako YamauchiBreast Cancer Group of the Japanese Radiation Oncology Study Group.
Hirosaki University · JPJichi Medical University · JPJikei University School of Medicine · JPJuntendo University · JPKindai University · JPKurume University · JPKyoto Prefectural University of Medicine · JPKyoto University · JPShiga Medical Center · JPSt. Luke's International Hospital · JPTeikyo University · JPTokyo Women's Medical University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Breast Cancer Group of the Japanese Radiation Oncology Study Group conducted a nationwide questionnaire survey on the clinical practice of postoperative radiotherapy for breast-conserving treatment for breast cancer. This questionnaire consisted of 18 questions pertaining to the annual number of treated patients, planning method, contouring structure, field design, dose-fractionated regimen, application of hypofractionated radiotherapy, boost irradiation, radiotherapy for synchronously bilateral breast cancer, and accelerated partial breast irradiation. The web-based questionnaire had responses from 293 Japanese hospitals. The results indicated the following: treatment planning is performed using relatively similar field designs and delivery methods; the field-in-field technique is used at more than one-third of institutes; the commonest criteria for boost irradiation is based on the surgical margin width (≤5 mm) and the second commonest criteria was age (≤40 or ≤50 years), although some facilities applied a different age criterion (>70 years) for omitting a tumor bed boost; for conventional fractionation, almost all institutes delivered 50 Gy in 25 fractions to the conserved whole breast and 10 Gy in 5 fractions to the tumor bed. This survey revealed that 43% of hospitals offered hypofractionated radiotherapy, and the most common regimens were 42.56 Gy in 16 fractions for whole-breast irradiation and 10.64 Gy in 4 fractions for boost irradiation. Almost all of the facilities irradiated both breasts simultaneously for synchronously bilateral breast cancer, and accelerated partial breast irradiation was rarely offered in Japan. This survey provided an overview of the current clinical practice of radiotherapy for breast-conserving treatment of breast cancer in Japan.

Indexed as

Organ Sparing TreatmentsPractice Patterns, Physicians'Surveys and QuestionnairesBreastBreast NeoplasmsDose-Response Relationship, RadiationFemaleHospitalsHumansJapanRadiation Dose HypofractionationRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted

Identifiers

PMID30476198
PMCPMC6373682
OpenAlexW2904529982

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.