Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30476122›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2019

Inpatient portal clusters: identifying user groups based on portal features.

Naleef Fareed, Daniel Walker, Cynthia J Sieck, Robert Taylor, Seth Scarborough, Timothy R Huerta, Ann Scheck McAlearney

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Unsupervised machine learning and prognostic factors of survival in chronic lymphocytic leukemia.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Exploring the Digital Divide: Age and Race Disparities in Use of an Inpatient Portal.Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Doing what matters most.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2019
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Naleef FareedDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Daniel WalkerCATALYST, Center for the Advancement of Team Science, Analytics, and Systems Thinking, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Cynthia J SieckCATALYST, Center for the Advancement of Team Science, Analytics, and Systems Thinking, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Robert TaylorCATALYST, Center for the Advancement of Team Science, Analytics, and Systems Thinking, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Seth ScarboroughCATALYST, Center for the Advancement of Team Science, Analytics, and Systems Thinking, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Timothy R HuertaDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Ann Scheck McAlearneyDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.

Funding

The Institute for the Design of Environments Aligned for Patient Safety (IDEA4PS)P30HS024379 · AHRQ · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI MCALEARNEY, ANN SCHECK · 2015 to 2015
$4.0M
High Tech and High Touch (HT2): Transforming patient engagement through portal technology at the bedsideR01HS024091 · AHRQ · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI MCALEARNEY, ANN SCHECK · 2015 to 2018
$967k
Portals in Inpatient Care (PIC): Evaluating the Usability, Use and Patient Experience Associated with Patient Portal Technology at the BedsideR21HS024349 · AHRQ · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI MCALEARNEY, ANN SCHECK · 2015 to 2015
$299k
Development and Evaluation of Socio-Technical Metrics to Inform HIT AdaptationR21HS024767 · AHRQ · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI YEN, PO-YIN · 2016 to 2017
$291k
AHRQ HHS P30 HS024379AHRQ HHS R01 HS024091AHRQ HHS R21 HS024349AHRQ HHS R21 HS024767
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Conduct a cluster analysis of inpatient portal (IPP) users from an academic medical center to improve understanding of who uses these portals and how. Methods: We used 18 months of data from audit log files, which recorded IPP user actions, of 2815 patient admissions. A hierarchical clustering algorithm was executed to group patient admissions on the basis of proportion of use for each of 10 IPP features. Post-hoc analyses were conducted to further understand IPP use. Results: Five cluster solutions were developed for the study sample. Our taxonomy included users with high levels of accessing features that were linked to reviewing schedules, results, tutorials, and ordering food. Patients tended to stay within their clusters over multiple admissions, and the clusters had differences based on patient and clinical characteristics. Discussion: Distinct groups of users exist among IPP users, suggesting that training on IPP use to enhance patient engagement could be tailored to patients. More exploration is also needed to understand why certain features were not used across all clusters. Conclusions: It is important to understand the specifics about how patients use IPPs to help them better engage with their healthcare. Our taxonomy enabled characterization of 5 groups of IPP users who demonstrated distinct preferences. These results may inform targeted improvements to IPP tools, could provide insights to improve patient training around portal use, and may help care team members effectively engage patients in the use of IPPs. We also discuss the implications of our findings for future research.

Indexed as

InpatientsPatient PortalsAcademic Medical CentersAttitude to ComputersCluster AnalysisFemaleHospitalizationHumansMale

Identifiers

PMID30476122
PMCPMC7647162

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.