ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2019
Inpatient portal clusters: identifying user groups based on portal features.
Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of In-Person vs Video Training and Access to All Functions vs a Limited Subset of Functions on Portal Use Among Inpatients: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2022Trial
- Lessons Learned From Developing Dashboards to Support Decision-Making for Community Opioid Response by Community Stakeholders: Mixed Methods and Multisite Study.JMIR human factors · 2024Article
- Simulation-derived best practices for clustering clinical data.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2021Article
- Differential Effects of Outpatient Portal User Status on Inpatient Portal Use: Observational Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2021Observational
- An electronic health record (EHR) log analysis shows limited clinician engagement with unsolicited genetic test results.JAMIA open · 2021Article
- Unsupervised machine learning and prognostic factors of survival in chronic lymphocytic leukemia.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2020Article
- Metrics for Outpatient Portal Use Based on Log File Analysis: Algorithm Development.Journal of medical Internet research · 2020Article
- Exploring the Digital Divide: Age and Race Disparities in Use of an Inpatient Portal.Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association · 2020Article
- Exploring How Professionals Within Agile Health Care Informatics Perceive Visualizations of Log File Analyses: Observational Study Followed by a Focus Group Interview.JMIR human factors · 2020Article
- Facilitating Organizational Change to Accommodate an Inpatient Portal.Applied clinical informatics · 2019Article
- Using Electronic Health Records Data to Evaluate the Impact of Information Technology on Improving Health Equity: Evidence from China.Journal of medical systems · 2019Article
- Doing what matters most.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2019Article
- Outpatient portal use among pregnant individuals: Cross-sectional, temporal, and cluster analysis of use.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objective: Conduct a cluster analysis of inpatient portal (IPP) users from an academic medical center to improve understanding of who uses these portals and how. Methods: We used 18 months of data from audit log files, which recorded IPP user actions, of 2815 patient admissions. A hierarchical clustering algorithm was executed to group patient admissions on the basis of proportion of use for each of 10 IPP features. Post-hoc analyses were conducted to further understand IPP use. Results: Five cluster solutions were developed for the study sample. Our taxonomy included users with high levels of accessing features that were linked to reviewing schedules, results, tutorials, and ordering food. Patients tended to stay within their clusters over multiple admissions, and the clusters had differences based on patient and clinical characteristics. Discussion: Distinct groups of users exist among IPP users, suggesting that training on IPP use to enhance patient engagement could be tailored to patients. More exploration is also needed to understand why certain features were not used across all clusters. Conclusions: It is important to understand the specifics about how patients use IPPs to help them better engage with their healthcare. Our taxonomy enabled characterization of 5 groups of IPP users who demonstrated distinct preferences. These results may inform targeted improvements to IPP tools, could provide insights to improve patient training around portal use, and may help care team members effectively engage patients in the use of IPPs. We also discuss the implications of our findings for future research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.