Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30476108›Full record

Trial reportThe Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy2019

Variability and exposure-response relationships of isavuconazole plasma concentrations in the Phase 3 SECURE trial of patients with invasive mould diseases.

Thomas Kaindl, David Andes, Marc Engelhardt, Mikael Saulay, Patrice Larger, Andreas H Groll

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase III
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. What Is New in Pulmonary Mucormycosis?Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Isavuconazole for COVID-19-Associated Invasive Mold Infections.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Thomas KaindlBasilea Pharmaceutica International Ltd, Basel, Switzerland.
David AndesDepartment of Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
Marc EngelhardtBasilea Pharmaceutica International Ltd, Basel, Switzerland.
Mikael SaulayICON plc, Allschwil, Switzerland.
Patrice LargerBasilea Pharmaceutica International Ltd, Basel, Switzerland.
Andreas H GrollDepartment of Paediatric Haematology/Oncology, University Children's Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis analysis evaluated the variability of isavuconazole plasma concentrations between subjects and between sampling times, and assessed their relationship to outcomes for subjects with invasive fungal disease (IFD) in the SECURE trial.

methodsIsavuconazole-treated subjects received 372 mg of isavuconazonium sulphate (corresponding to 200 mg of isavuconazole) three times daily for 2 days, then once daily. Plasma samples were collected after day 4 and analysis sets were constructed as follows: analysis set 1 included all samples from subjects with proven/probable/possible IFD who received ≥1 dose of isavuconazole; analysis set 2 included samples from subjects in analysis set 1 who had provided >1 sample; and analysis set 3 included samples from subjects in analysis set 1 with proven/probable invasive aspergillosis. Assessments included overall distributions of plasma concentrations and variability between samples (analysis sets 1 and 2) as well as relationships to outcomes [all-cause mortality (day 42), overall response (end of treatment) and treatment-emergent adverse events; analysis sets 1 and 3].

resultsAnalysis sets 1, 2 and 3 included samples from 160, 97 and 98 subjects, respectively. Trough concentrations for each were distributed similarly [mean (SD): 3406.6 (1511.5), 3495.6 (1503.3) and 3368.1 (1523.2) ng/mL, respectively]. The mean coefficient of variation between samples in analysis set 2 was 23.2%; differences between concentrations in first samples and subsequent samples were <2-fold for 85/97 subjects. In quartiles of subject data, no concentration-dependent relationships were observed for efficacy or safety.

conclusionsPlasma concentrations of isavuconazole were reasonably consistent between subjects and sampling times, and were not associated with differences in outcomes.

Indexed as

Antifungal AgentsAspergillosisAspergillusDrug MonitoringFemaleHumansInvasive Fungal InfectionsMaleNitrilesPyridinesTreatment OutcomeTriazolesAntifungal AgentsisavuconazoleNitrilesPyridinesTriazoles

Identifiers

PMID30476108
PMCPMC6376854

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.