Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30476062›Full record

ArticleEuropace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology2018

Species differences in the morphology of transverse tubule openings in cardiomyocytes.

Eva Alicja Rog-Zielinska, Cherrie Hei Ting Kong, Callum Michael Zgierski-Johnston, Paul Verkade, Judith Mantell, Mark Bryden Cannell, Peter Kohl

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Calcium Signaling in Cardiomyocyte Function.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2020
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Eva Alicja Rog-ZielinskaInstitute for Experimental Cardiovascular Medicine, University Heart Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Elsässerstraße 2Q, Freiburg, Germany.
Cherrie Hei Ting KongSchool of Physiology, Pharmacology & Neuroscience, Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Callum Michael Zgierski-JohnstonInstitute for Experimental Cardiovascular Medicine, University Heart Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Elsässerstraße 2Q, Freiburg, Germany.
Paul VerkadeSchool of Biochemistry and Wolfson Bioimaging Facility, Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Judith MantellSchool of Biochemistry and Wolfson Bioimaging Facility, Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Mark Bryden CannellSchool of Physiology, Pharmacology & Neuroscience, Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Peter KohlInstitute for Experimental Cardiovascular Medicine, University Heart Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Elsässerstraße 2Q, Freiburg, Germany.
University of Bristol · GBUniversity of Freiburg · DE

Funding

British Heart Foundation FS/15/3/31047Medical Research Council MR/N002903/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsThe ultrastructure of ventricular cardiomyocyte T-tubule connections with the outer cell surface ('mouth' regions) has been reported to differ between mice and rabbits. In mice, T-tubule mouths form convoluted narrow spaces filled with electron-dense matter that impedes diffusion between T-tubular lumen and bulk extracellular space. Here, we explore whether T-tubule mouths are also constricted in rat (another murine model used frequently for cardiac research) and whether pig and human T-tubule mouth configurations are structurally more similar to mice or rabbits. METHODS AND

resultsWe used chemically-fixed tissue and high-pressure frozen isolated cardiomyocytes to compare T-tubule mouth architecture using transmission electron microscopy and three-dimensional electron tomography. We find that rat T-tubular mouth architecture is more similar to that of rabbits than mice, lacking the marked tortuosity and electron-dense ground substance that obstructs access to deeper portions of the T-tubular system in mice. Pilot observations in larger mammals (pig, human) suggest that mouse may be the least representative animal model of T-tubule connectivity with the outer cell surface in larger mammals.

conclusionRat T-tubular system architecture appears to be more similar in size and topology to larger mammals than mice. T-tubular mouth topology may contribute to differences in experimental model behaviour, underscoring the challenge of appropriate model selection for research into cell and tissue function.

Indexed as

AnimalsElectron Microscope TomographyExcitation Contraction CouplingHeart VentriclesHumansMice, Inbred C57BLMicroscopy, Electron, TransmissionMyocardial ContractionMyocytes, CardiacRabbitsRats, Sprague-DawleySpecies SpecificitySus scrofaVentricular Function

Identifiers

PMID30476062
PMCPMC6251183
OpenAlexW2904334384

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.