Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30476031›Full record

ReviewFamily practice2019

Adaption and validation of the Working Alliance Inventory for General Practice: qualitative review and cross-sectional surveys.

Elizabeth A Sturgiss, Elizabeth Rieger, Emily Haesler, Matthew J Ridd, Kirsty Douglas, Shelley L Galvin

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Family practice, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05788302 (Mechanisms Underlying Efficacy of Prolonged Exposure), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05788302 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Mechanisms Underlying Efficacy of Prolonged Exposure

TypeinterventionalSponsorMassachusetts General HospitalRan2023 to 2027Enrolled50ConditionsPost Traumatic Stress DisorderArmsProlonged Exposure
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. The therapeutic relationship between a client and dietitian: A systematic integrative review of empirical literature.Nutrition & dietetics : the journal of the Dietitians Association of Australia · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Clinical Communication in Rehabilitation.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Elizabeth A SturgissAcademic Unit of General Practice, Australian National University Medical School, The Australian National University, Garran, Australia.
Elizabeth RiegerResearch School of Psychology, Australian National University Research School of Psychology, The Australian National University, Acton, Australia.
Emily HaeslerAcademic Unit of General Practice, Australian National University Medical School, The Australian National University, Garran, Australia.
Matthew J RiddCentre for Academic Primary Care, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Kirsty DouglasAcademic Unit of General Practice, Australian National University Medical School, The Australian National University, Garran, Australia.
Shelley L GalvinUNC Health Sciences at MAHEC, Mountain Area Health Education Center, Asheville, NC, USA.

Funding

Department of Health PDF-2014-07-013
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRelational aspects of primary care are important, but we have no standard measure for assessment. The 'working alliance' incorporates elements of the therapeutic relationship, shared decision-making, goal setting and communication skills. The Working Alliance Inventory (short form) (WAI-SF) has been used in adult psychology, and a high score on the survey is associated with improved outcomes for clients.

objectiveTo adapt the WAI-SF for use between GPs and patients and to test its concurrent validity with measures of shared decision-making and the doctor-patient relationship and discriminant validity with measures of social desirability.

methodsTwo rounds of online survey feedback from 55 GPs and 47 patients were used to adapt the WAI-SF-the WAI-GP. The tool was then completed by 142 patients in waiting rooms after seeing their GP and by 16 GPs at the end of their session. Concurrent validity with measures of shared decision-making and patient-doctor depth of relationship was determined using Spearman Rho correlations. Patients also completed two social desirability surveys, and discriminant validity with WAI-GP was assessed.

resultsFollowing feedback, the survey was re-worded to remove phrases that were perceived as judgmental or irrelevant. The patient measure of the WAI-GP was strongly correlated with Dyadic OPTION (rho = 0.705, P = 0.0001) and Patient-Doctor Depth of Relationship scale (rho = 0.591, P = 0.0001) and not with measures of social desirability.

conclusionThe psychometric properties of the WAI-GP support its use for measuring GP-patient alliance. Possibilities for use include assessing the influence of therapeutic alliance on the effectiveness of interventions.

Indexed as

Decision Making, SharedPhysician-Patient RelationsPrimary Health CareAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansInternetMaleMiddle AgedPatient SatisfactionPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesGeneral practicephysician-patient relationsprimary health carequality of carequantitative evaluationsurvey methods

Identifiers

PMID30476031
PMCPMC6669034

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.