Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30475871›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Psychotropic use patterns: Are there differences between men and women?

Camila Stéfani Estancial Fernandes, Renata Cruz Soares de Azevedo, Moisés Goldbaum, Marilisa Berti de Azevedo Barros

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
10.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Prevalence of antidepressant use in Brazil: a systematic review with meta-analysis.Revista brasileira de psiquiatria (Sao Paulo, Brazil : 1999) · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Microbiology spectrum · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Can Meals Outside Homes Impact Sodium Intake?Current developments in nutrition · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Camila Stéfani Estancial FernandesDepartment of Public Health, School of Medical Sciences, State University of Campinas, Campinas, Sao Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-6921-2429
Renata Cruz Soares de AzevedoDepartment of Medical Psychology and Psychiatry, School of Medical Sciences, State University of Campinas, Campinas, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Moisés GoldbaumDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Medical School, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Marilisa Berti de Azevedo BarrosDepartment of Public Health, School of Medical Sciences, State University of Campinas, Campinas, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) · BRUniversidade de São Paulo · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study analyzed differences between men and women regarding the use of psychotropic drugs and associated factors in a population of adults and seniors in the city of Campinas, Brazil. A population-based, cross-sectional study was conducted using data from the ISACamp 2014/2015 health survey in the city of Campinas. The sample was composed of 1999 individuals aged 20 years or older. For each sex, prevalence rates and prevalence ratios were estimated for the use of psychotropic drugs according to demographic characteristics, socioeconomic characteristics, health problems, degree of limitation and type of emotional/mental problem. The most used classes of medications were also determined. The prevalence of the use of psychotropic drugs was 11.7% (7.3% among men and 15.8% among women). The most common therapeutic classes were antidepressants (38.2%) and benzodiazepines (24.0%). The frequency of antidepressant use was higher among women (44.3%) than men (25.5%). Regarding associated factors, reports of emotional/mental problems were associated with the greater use of this type of drug in both sexes. Among the men, white skin color, a lack of an occupational activity, a greater number of complaints of health problems and the occurrence of insomnia were associated with the use psychotropic drugs. Among the women, a significant increase in the use of these drugs was found with the increase in age and higher prevalence rates were found among those with a higher level of schooling, those with a greater number of diagnosed chronic diseases and those with a common mental disorder. The present results confirm the greater use of psychotropic agents, especially antidepressants, in the female sex and reveal that the pattern of associated factors differs between sexes. It is therefore necessary to understand the peculiarities of each sex that exert an influence on the perception of health problems and the desire to seek care, which, in turn, affect the use of psychotropic agents.

Indexed as

AdultAge FactorsCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMental DisordersMiddle AgedPrevalencePsychotropic DrugsSex FactorsSocioeconomic FactorsYoung AdultPsychotropic Drugs

Identifiers

PMID30475871
PMCPMC6257918
OpenAlexW2902625372

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.