Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30475870›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Quantifying the complexity of black-and-white images.

Damián H Zanette

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Damián H ZanetteCentro Atómico Bariloche and Instituto Balseiro, Comisión Nacional de Energía Atómica and Universidad Nacional de Cuyo, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, 8400 San Carlos de Bariloche, Río Negro, Argentina.ORCID 0000-0003-0681-0592
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas · AR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We propose a complexity measure for black-and-white (B/W) digital images, based on the detection of typical length scales in the depicted motifs. Complexity is associated with diversity in those length scales. In this sense, the proposed measure penalizes images where typical scales are limited to small lengths, of a few pixels -as in an image where gray levels are distributed at random- or to lengths similar to the image size -as when gray levels are ordered into a simple, broad pattern. We introduce a complexity index which captures the structural richness of images with a wide range of typical scales, and compare several images with each other on the basis of this index. Since the index provides an objective quantification of image complexity, it could be used as the counterpart of subjective visual complexity in experimental perception research. As an application of the complexity index, we build a "complexity map" for South-American topography, by analyzing a large B/W image that represents terrain elevation data in the continent. Results show that the complexity index is able to clearly reveal regions with intricate topographical features such as river drainage networks and fjord-like coasts. Although, for the sake of concreteness, our complexity measure is introduced for B/W images, the definition can be straightforwardly extended to any object that admits a mathematical representation as a function of one or more variables. Thus, the quantification of structural richness can be adapted to time signals and distributions of various kinds.

Indexed as

PhotographyColorImage Processing, Computer-Assisted

Identifiers

PMID30475870
PMCPMC6258117
OpenAlexW2902195134

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.