Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30475865›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Impact of "test and treat" recommendations on eligibility for antiretroviral treatment: Cross sectional population survey data from three high HIV prevalence countries.

Menard Laurent Chihana, Helena Huerga, Gilles Van Cutsem, Tom Ellman, Stephen Wanjala, Charles Masiku, Elisabeth Szumilin, Jean Francois Etard, Mary-Ann Davies, David Maman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Menard Laurent ChihanaCentre for Infectious Diseases and Epidemiology, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0003-2616-9894
Helena HuergaEpicentre, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0003-0302-9063
Gilles Van CutsemCentre for Infectious Diseases and Epidemiology, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Tom EllmanSouthern Africa Medical Unit, Médecins Sans Frontières, Cape Town, South Africa.
Stephen WanjalaMédecins Sans Frontières, Nairobi, Kenya.
Charles MasikuMédecins Sans Frontières, Lilongwe, Malawi.
Elisabeth SzumilinMédecins Sans Frontières, Paris, France.
Jean Francois EtardEpicentre, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-4873-0788
Mary-Ann DaviesCentre for Infectious Diseases and Epidemiology, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
David MamanCentre for Infectious Diseases and Epidemiology, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLatest WHO guidelines recommend starting HIV-positive individuals on antiretroviral therapy treatment (ART) regardless of CD4 count. We assessed additional impact of adopting new WHO guidelines.

methodsWe used data of individuals aged 15-59 years from three HIV population surveys conducted in 2012 (Kenya) and 2013 (Malawi and South Africa). Individuals were interviewed at home followed by rapid HIV and CD4 testing if tested HIV-positive. HIV-positive individuals were classified as "eligible for ART" if (i) had ever been initiated on ART or (ii) were not yet on ART but met the criteria for starting ART based on country's guidelines at the time of the survey (Kenya-CD4< = 350 cells/μl and WHO Stage 3 or 4 disease, Malawi as for Kenya plus lifelong ART for all pregnant and breastfeeding women, South Africa as for Kenya plus ART for pregnant and breastfeeding women until cessation of breastfeeding).

findingsOf 18,991 individuals who tested, 4,113 (21.7%) were HIV-positive. Using country's ART eligibility guidelines at the time of the survey, the proportion of HIV-infected individuals eligible for ART was 60.0% (95% CI: 57.2-62.7) (Kenya), 73.4% (70.8-75.8) (South Africa) and 80.1% (77.3-82.6) (Malawi). Applying WHO 2013 guidelines (eligibility at CD4< = 500 and Option B+ for pregnant and breastfeeding women), the proportions eligible were 82.0% (79.8-84.1) (Kenya), 83.7% (81.5-85.6) (South Africa) and 87.6% (85.0-89.8) (Malawi). Adopting "test and treat" would mean a further 18.0% HIV-positive individuals (Kenya), 16.3% (South Africa) and 12.4% (Malawi) would become eligible. In all countries, about 20% of adolescents (aged 15-19 years), became eligible for ART moving from WHO 2013 to "test and treat" while no differences by sex were observed.

conclusionCountries that have already implemented 2013 WHO recommendations, the burden of implementing "test and treat" would be small. Youth friendly programmes to help adolescents access and adhere to treatment will be needed.

Indexed as

Guidelines as TopicAdolescentAdultAnti-Retroviral AgentsCD4 Lymphocyte CountCross-Sectional StudiesEligibility DeterminationFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansKenyaMalawiMaleMiddle AgedPrevalenceSouth AfricaAnti-Retroviral Agents

Identifiers

PMID30475865
PMCPMC6261019

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.