ArticlePloS one2018
Evolutionary regime transitions in structured populations.
Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Fixation probability in evolutionary dynamics on switching temporal networks.Journal of mathematical biology · 2023Article
- Fixation dynamics on hypergraphs.PLoS computational biology · 2023Article
- Spectral analysis of transient amplifiers for death-birth updating constructed from regular graphs.Journal of mathematical biology · 2021Article
- Fixation probabilities in evolutionary dynamics under weak selection.Journal of mathematical biology · 2021Article
- Fixation probabilities in graph-structured populations under weak selection.PLoS computational biology · 2021Article
- Limits on amplifiers of natural selection under death-Birth updating.PLoS computational biology · 2020Article
- Transient amplifiers of selection and reducers of fixation for death-Birth updating on graphs.PLoS computational biology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The evolutionary dynamics of a finite population where resident individuals are replaced by mutant ones depends on its spatial structure. Usually, the population adopts the form of an undirected graph where the place occupied by each individual is represented by a vertex and it is bidirectionally linked to the places that can be occupied by its offspring. There are undirected graph structures that act as amplifiers of selection increasing the probability that the offspring of an advantageous mutant spreads through the graph reaching any vertex. But there also are undirected graph structures acting as suppressors of selection where this probability is less than that of the same individual placed in a homogeneous population. Here, firstly, we present the distribution of these evolutionary regimes for all undirected graphs with N ≤ 10 vertices. Some of them exhibit transitions between different regimes when the mutant fitness increases. In particular, as it has been already observed for small-order random graphs, we show that most graphs of order N ≤ 10 are amplifiers of selection. Secondly, we describe examples of amplifiers of order 7 that become suppressors from some critical value. In fact, for graphs of order N ≤ 7, we apply computer-aided techniques to symbolically compute their fixation probability and then their evolutionary regime, as well as the critical values for which they change their regime. Thirdly, the same technique is applied to some families of highly symmetrical graphs as a mean to explore methods of suppressing selection. The existence of suppression mechanisms that reverse an amplification regime when fitness increases could have a great interest in biology and network science. Finally, the analysis of all graphs from order 8 to order 10 reveals a complex and rich evolutionary dynamics, with multiple transitions between different regimes, which have not been examined in detail until now.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.