Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30475808›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Variation in the quality and out-of-pocket cost of treatment for childhood malaria, diarrhoea, and pneumonia: Community and facility based care in rural Uganda.

Seyi Soremekun, Frida Kasteng, Raghu Lingam, Anna Vassall, Edmound Kertho, Stella Settumba, Patrick L Etou, Agnes Nanyonjo, Guus Ten Asbroek, Karin Kallander and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Care seeking for diarrheal illness: a systematic review and meta-analysis.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

Seyi SoremekunDepartment of Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-5531-0220
Frida KastengDepartment of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London United Kingdom.
Raghu LingamDepartment of Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London United Kingdom.
Anna VassallDepartment of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London United Kingdom.
Edmound KerthoThe Malaria Consortium, Kampala, Uganda.
Stella SettumbaThe Malaria Consortium, Kampala, Uganda.
Patrick L EtouInstitute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle, United Kingdom.
Agnes NanyonjoThe Malaria Consortium, Kampala, Uganda.
Guus Ten AsbroekDepartment of Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London United Kingdom.
Karin KallanderDivision of Global Health, Department of Public Health Sciences, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Betty KirkwoodDepartment of Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London United Kingdom.
inSCALE Study Group
London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBMalaria Consortium · UGKarolinska Institutet · SEMalaria Consortium · GBNewcastle University · GBUNSW Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA key barrier to appropriate treatment for malaria, diarrhoea, and pneumonia (MDP) in children under 5 years of age in low income rural settings is the lack of access to quality health care. The WHO and UNICEF have therefore called for the scale-up of integrated community case management (iCCM) using community health workers (CHWs). The current study assessed access to treatment, out-of-pocket expenditure and the quality of treatment provided in the public and private sectors compared to national guidelines, using data collected in a large representative survey of caregivers of children in 205 villages with iCCM-trained CHWs in mid-Western Uganda.

resultsThe prevalence of suspected malaria, diarrhoea and suspected pneumonia in the preceding two weeks in 6501 children in the study sample were 45%, 11% and 24% respectively. Twenty percent of children were first taken to a CHW, 56% to a health facility, 14% to other providers and no care was sought for 11%. The CHW was more likely to provide appropriate treatment compared to any other provider or to those not seeking care for children with MDP (RR 1.51, 95% CI 1.42-1.61, p<0.001). Seeking care from a CHW had the lowest cost outlay (median $0.00, IQR $0.00-$1.80), whilst seeking care to a private doctor or clinic the highest (median $2.80, IQR $1.20-$6.00). We modelled the expected increase in overall treatment coverage if children currently treated in the private sector or not seeking care were taken to the CHW instead. In this scenario, coverage of appropriate treatment for MDP could increase in total from the current rate of 47% up to 64%.

conclusionScale-up of iCCM-trained CHW programmes is key to the provision of affordable, high quality treatment for sick children, and can thus significantly contribute to closing the gap in coverage of appropriate treatment.

Indexed as

Health Care CostsChildChild, PreschoolCommunity Health ServicesCommunity Health WorkersCosts and Cost AnalysisDiarrheaHumansMalariaPatient Acceptance of Health CarePneumoniaPrevalenceQuality of Health CareRural PopulationUganda

Identifiers

PMID30475808
PMCPMC6261061
OpenAlexW2902964709

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.